Take our RRSP quiz!

GIC Chart | Site suggestions | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest
sp_LogInOut Log Insp_Registration Register
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed Topic RSSsp_TopicIcon
February 23, 2026
11:25 am
GIC-Fanatic
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 464
Member Since:
December 18, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Would it be possible to have the 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 year columns have a summary at the bottom?
Ie.
Highest Rate
Lowest Rate
Average Rate

IMG_1246-2.jpeg

February 23, 2026
11:29 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3663
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online

You can sort high to low, or low to high for the specific term you wish by clicking the arrows in the header.

Average is meaningless. One can eyeball it in one's head within 0.1%

February 23, 2026
11:31 am
GIC-Fanatic
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 464
Member Since:
December 18, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Yes, I am aware of that.

IMG_1246-2.jpeg

February 23, 2026
11:50 am
Peter
Admin
Forum Posts: 1509
Member Since:
May 15, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It's certainly possible. Are you thinking it would just list the numbers and not who is providing the low/high rate? I just don't want to make it seem like we're recommending or endorsing certain ones over others. Also, it's far from a comprehensive list, so I don't want to make it seem like it's some cross-Canada average.

February 23, 2026
2:00 pm
smayer97
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1062
Member Since:
September 29, 2017
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online

Agreed. Adding Low/High/Avg would bring up more issues. It is easy enough to sort to get those answers. And Avg is meaningless, so why add it?

Top