Horrible experience with PC Finacial | Page 2 | Simplii Financial | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Horrible experience with PC Finacial
September 7, 2014
2:47 pm
kanaka
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1232
Member Since:
December 23, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

LUKING said

Jack Manning And Loonie
There are 2 things here:
1. PC advertised the saving account as a high interest account and justified it by stating that they are passing on the savings to customers as they don't have branches etc. The bank account itself was advertised as high interest. I don't have a problem with fluctuations with rates, problem is that they deliberately and deceivingly turned high interest account to a low interest normal rate account and then started new product with different name. With same type of deceiving advertisements again.
2. ING has exactly similar bank account, high interest blah blah. I have been with them for over a decade now, never had to look at interest rate (because when I looked at during first few years, it was always the higher than any other bank)
But then again, they were not owned by Canadians till now!
What a shameless society we are building for ourselves.

And yes, I am escalating this issue, have also killed my spouse's account as well which also had xxxxx sitting in it. If anyone knows what other financial regulators we can complain to, please let me know. Thanks in advance.

Luking. Either walk away silently or tell someone at PC Financial preferably the CEO as well as Galen Weston as well as any of their social websites like Facebook etc. While your efforts may or may not fall upon deaf ears you will likely convince a few others to drop them. While we in the west are not all that entrenched with shopping there, there is no way in h#lI would bank there. It has never made sense to me that a supermarket can do better than the bank itself that is backing it. If they are better for rates and service it shows us how CIBC takes advantage of their customers, doesn't it? There are too many other solid intuitions with good rates...no promos.....I have spread out my dollars and use each institution to my advantage. There is no one institution that who'll meet any prudent investors needs. I only allow one or two mistakes by a financial institution....I leave....unfortunately it is not that easy any more to complete the transition quickly, when you have 5 year GIC's that need to mature. Lol.. We all live and learn over the years.

September 7, 2014
7:58 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9245
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Jack Manning said

When their rates were not competitive anymore and it was not worthwhile we closed the joint account. They asked us why we are closing the joint account? We said remember, we used to be clients.

Our point is never tell them the truth why you are doing anything because when they make decisions about their financial institution's policies they have every excuse in the book. These days it is every excuse in their computer.

My answer to these kinds of questions is always something along the lines of "because that's what I decided" or "that's confidential". It's all about Sales from their perspective. They want the info so that they can tell you why you've got it wrong. No, thanks. I've got it right.

LUKING, please keep us informed as to how you make out with your complaint. The only other route that I can think of that might help is if you can get a journalist onside who does consumer affairs reporting. That would publicly embarrass them even more than this forum. It IS a sleazy practice, regardless of whether they can justify it by putting the onus back on you.

September 7, 2014
8:09 pm
Jack Manning
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 379
Member Since:
August 5, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Loonie, we have multiple answers for different financial institutions. The above example was a specific case. We actually asked them for a copy of the documents for the account closure. They wrote something that we didn't even tell them.

So when they asked us we tell them why we close our account, we just don't answer them or we ask them to make sure that they sign with us or we will not sign until they do.

If no signing is required we don't care and just leave or hang up if it is by telephone. It is not worth dealing with incompetence and idiocy.

As for LUKING, Loonie, a journalist may be hard to find to investigate a complaint unless it is a subject matter that has many complaints that keeps occurring over and over and it is a sizable amount of money involved too.

September 7, 2014
8:15 pm
Jack Manning
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 379
Member Since:
August 5, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Loonie, remember when they used to say the customer is always right. Well this is true unless they can find many more customers to replace other customers that left.

It is like a revolving door, catch new clients, not as wise, less or no experienced coming in and let the older, wiser customers that continue to complain go out.

September 7, 2014
8:46 pm
kanaka
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1232
Member Since:
December 23, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Jack Manning said

Loonie, remember when they used to say the customer is always right. Well this is true unless they can find many more customers to replace other customers that left.

It is like a revolving door, catch new clients, not as wise, less or no experienced coming in and let the older, wiser customers that continue to complain go out.

Being in the retail trade I was told years ago that a disappointed and complaining customer can take another ten with them. Today with the internet and social sites I could revise that number to at least 25. Sure a revolving door but it depends on the business. Say if you are talking home phone Telus or Shaw......they may not care. For every 20 Shaw lost is 20 gains for Telus and vis versa .... But if one has a retention program they minimize their losses, but only if you complain. And you need to complain properly. But if there is a lot of choice like banks, and I imagine it is 50/50 some care and some don't. Giving a legit complaint even if you have decided to leave, no matter what, or they contact you after and ask why. I no longer reply as you telling then how to do their business better for everyone that is new or has remained....and if there was an improvement, you won't benefit......thus the sealed lips may be the best choice depending on the issue.

September 7, 2014
9:51 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9245
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

This reminds me of something I had forgotten. There was something in the media perhaps a year or so ago, where they were looking at the complaints process in the banking industry and how, in the end, no mater how far up the ladder you go, it is all discretionary on the part of the bank as to whether they do anything or not. I recall that one of the things that was mentioned is that you have to be very cautious when talking to the bank's own ombudsman, and you need to remember that they work for the bank and are not really independent as the name suggests. Anything you say to anyone along the line can and will be used against you. I wish I could remember more of the details.

September 7, 2014
10:49 pm
Jack Manning
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 379
Member Since:
August 5, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Loonie, I remember a news story about what you are talking about but I can't remember what exactly or where I heard it.

kanaka, I heard the worse thing companies hate the most are silent customers that don't complain and don't make a big fuss when a problem occurs.

They either close their account or accounts, they do much less business with them or they simply disappear as a customer and do no business maybe for months if not years.

The real, only impacting defense us consumers have are hitting them in the pocket book, bank account, costing them money.

Why do you think they created Facebook, Twitter etc. It is to track people and see what they are so angry, disappointed, complaining about.

September 8, 2014
12:05 am
Jack Manning
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 379
Member Since:
August 5, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Loonie, we don't have accounts with PC Financial and never did have an accounts with them. The main reason is that we had a bad experience with CIBC about 17 years ago charging us annual fees with our RRSP's that we had a written letter stating that we would not be charged these annual fees because we had a combined $25,000 in our accounts.

They refunded the first year of fees but refused to do it again next year.

September 8, 2014
7:27 am
Jon
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 418
Member Since:
August 9, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The rule of thumb, nobody care about your money other than yourself

September 8, 2014
11:10 am
kanaka
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1232
Member Since:
December 23, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Jack Manning said

Loonie, I remember a news story about what you are talking about but I can't remember what exactly or where I heard it.

kanaka, I heard the worse thing companies hate the most are silent customers that don't complain and don't make a big fuss when a problem occurs.

They either close their account or accounts, they do much less business with them or they simply disappear as a customer and do no business maybe for months if not years.

The real, only impacting defense us consumers have are hitting them in the pocket book, bank account, costing them money.

Why do you think they created Facebook, Twitter etc. It is to track people and see what they are so angry, disappointed, complaining about.

sf-confused Luckily I am not into Facebook or the like. Main reason is, that they are far too invasive in regards to information on your PC and what you do online if you remain signed in. Google is my only bad habit, that I am aware of. From what I see what Jack and Loonie are saying....I think I will remain as one that will make a silent departure. sf-smile My time share even does a survey after either stay. When I book a resort I don't want to buy more credits and be harassed by a salesman when I am there and usually disconnect the phones in the room. If there are small issues that don't meet their commitment of me paying maintenance fees to keep the resort and rooms is as new condition, I usually don't bother. Other than a few questions their surveys are worded so well that it doesn't matter how you answer they come out smelling like roses. Of that bad ones I have done many have not replied and my complaint may make it better for others but not me nor am I compensated. So no more surveys for me (for any one)!!!

September 9, 2014
5:45 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6768
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Jack Manning said

Norman1, I don't care if it in the fine print or it is in a magic black book. They are not paying people interest for that extra day and are charging interest for it. If you want to be played for a fool that is up to you but I know when someone is not paying me.
....

They are not paying you because you are not entitled to anything extra. It is foolish to insist on and complain about something one has no right to.

Terms matter. It's not good to be in the dark about what one is investing in. When I buy a strip bond, I will receive 100% of the face value of the bond on the maturity date. Period. Nothing until then. Nothing about number of leap days in the years between now and then.

Terms do vary. Some accounts/credit cards pay/charge a daily rate of 1/365 of the annual interest rate during non-leap years and 1/366 of the annual rate during leap years. Others pay/charge a fixed 1/365 daily no matter how many days in the year.

There's even variations in the daily balance used by daily interest accounts calculate interest. Some calculate the interest using the closing balance of each day. Others use the minimum balance of each day.

It good to know what one is in before complaining.

Don't know where your idea that the terms between loans and deposit accounts should somehow match comes from. I'm not aware of any such requirement. There's plenty of evidence otherwise. There were savings accounts that paid interest each month on the minimum balance for the month. Was there actually a credit card, mortgage, or loan I could get that charged interest on the minimum outstanding balance of each month?

September 9, 2014
6:10 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6768
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Loonie said

This reminds me of something I had forgotten. There was something in the media perhaps a year or so ago, where they were looking at the complaints process in the banking industry and how, in the end, no mater how far up the ladder you go, it is all discretionary on the part of the bank as to whether they do anything or not. I recall that one of the things that was mentioned is that you have to be very cautious when talking to the bank's own ombudsman, and you need to remember that they work for the bank and are not really independent as the name suggests. Anything you say to anyone along the line can and will be used against you. I wish I could remember more of the details.

That doesn't matter, Loonie. Each side will be asked by the judge or ombudsman for the full set of facts.

One's right to remain silent or not self-incriminate only applies to criminal cases and not civil cases. Civil cases are often not black or white. The plaintiff can be found to be partially responsible for his or her losses and the award adjusted accordingly.

September 9, 2014
7:08 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9245
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I don't think it's a civil case though. It's not a court of law.

September 9, 2014
8:35 pm
Jack Manning
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 379
Member Since:
August 5, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Norman1, you are the excuse person for everything from credit card companies to CRA that is inconsistent in this world. Inconsistency is not integrity anyway you look at it.

Just because it is in a contract, it is a law put in by government or whatever authority you want to choose, it is deceptive, dishonest and an insult to our intelligence.

If they charge interest for that day on February-29 every 4 years then they have to pay for it. Anything less is just not right and once again everyone is being fooled, ripped off. It is not extra because it is a day of interest in the 4th year and every 4th year. It is not something made up and changed like in their contract, policies invented by them.

Unlike them, I play by the rules and don't change the rules from taxes to terms and conditions. This is just one example of why most Canadians have no choice to have money invested but know that they are being nickeled and dimmed from any which way.

They, the corporations, financial institutions, banks, government etc. are ones that feel entitled but I would use a better word, greedy to make profits twice, charging interest to us and then not paying it to us.

Any accrued interest and compound interest from any compound interest investment whether it is a compound GIC or zero coupon bonds that is not paid, is even more entitlement, greed on their part. We are all losing interest on interest which makes this even worse for depositors, investors.

Interest is paid for days, time passed. Just because they decided to cut everyone else out does not mean that they are correct.

September 9, 2014
8:45 pm
Jack Manning
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 379
Member Since:
August 5, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Loonie, you are correct. An ombudsman works for banks, financial institutions and companies and does not act as a judge, legal agent of a court of law.

They do this also with arbitration which is not a court of law but another tactic in their favor to limit any losses, damages if or that they have to pay.

In the U.S., the only other top dog that could drag out meaningful amounts of money, billions that are still small compared to the losses banks, mortgage companies created in 2007 to 2009 etc. is the U.S government.

September 9, 2014
9:03 pm
Jack Manning
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 379
Member Since:
August 5, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Kanaka, I hear you loud and clear. Surveys, questionnaires, constant questions, tracking or trying to track everything we do is getting not only to be a hassle but creepy as well.

Most companies, banks, financial institutions know what is wrong but they don't care anyway. This is especially true with the largest financial institutions that buy out smaller ones and merge with others.

I would say they are more interested in selling our information so at least when we close accounts, leave, they are still making some money off of us. We have the right to remain silent!

September 17, 2014
5:07 pm
LUKING
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 8
Member Since:
September 6, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I guess the only recourse we have is to make others aware of it.

September 17, 2014
6:05 pm
SlowPoke
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 51
Member Since:
September 17, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

LUKING said

When PC started their services several years ago, they advertised heavily for a high interest savings account. While the rates were subject to fluctuations, they were still quite a bit higher than what the big banks offered so I transferred XXXXXX in the account. The interest did continue to stream in for some time so I decided to forget about it.
Recently by accident, I noticed that the money was not earning any interest so I callled them. I was told that they decided to lower the interest rate on savings account to similar to what othr banks offered and instead started a new product in its place - the so called interest plus or whatever.
They of course did not bother informing clients. Or seek their approval in writing. Nor did they bother to grand father the deal by moving the money to new account.
The net result is that I have lost over a thousand dollars.
Sure enough, I should have been a little more careful, but then again I never had any issue like this with ING direct. I saw PC's promos fr new clients but simply had no idea that they had changed the business model completely without letting clients know.
Or perhaps this is the business model - get the client's foot in the door by showing them a few bucks and then stab them in the back when they are not looking.
I have decided to get all money out immediately

Hmmm, as soon as I began reading this post I recalled a notice they sent out about changing the account quiet some time ago, but tossed it as it did not apply to me. Now I may be wrong but that is what I recall. And it has been my experience that they have sent notices. For example they did indicate the account would be discontinued and that the interest plus account would no longer pay the anniversary bonus but that the $1000 minimum was no longer required to get the best rate.

Other Banks also change the terms and rates of their accounts TD comes to mind as one experience. We are pretty much at their mercy as to the services they offer and change when they see profit in doing so.

Just wondering if your mail may have been mis-delivered by Canada Post as mine has been on many occasions with some pieces showing up weeks + later while others never made their way to our mailbox.

September 17, 2014
9:17 pm
Jack Manning
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 379
Member Since:
August 5, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

SlowPoke, yes, you are right. We are at their mercy when it comes to them changing terms and conditions of their contracts but the major Canadian banks and other global, multinational banks make so many more changes from fees, interest rates to deposit promotions etc.

Smaller and medium financial institutions are more understanding and competitive when it comes to interest rates, fees and other items in their terms and conditions. This is just what I noticed over the last 17 or 18 years now.

September 17, 2014
9:23 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9245
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The change that bugs me the most is when they introduce or increase fees mid-stream. If you have an RRSP, for example, which is invested in a GIC, you have no recourse if they decide, half-way through the term of your GIC, to increase the fee for transferring your RRSP to another institution, or any other fee for that matter. Yes, they have to give you X days' notice, but only by sheer luck would that coincide with timing that would enable you to move your RRSP if you didn't want to accept the new arrangement. Personally, I think that should be illegal, because the customer is cornered. It's certainly unethical.

No permission to create posts

Please write your comments in the forum.