Pulling funds from Motive | Page 2 | Motive Financial | Discussion forum

Norman1 said

Norman1 said Definitely not standard procedure. But, it shows what could happen if something looks fishy to the financial institution.

Rick said
Isn't that kind of a good thing?

It is when it was actually fraud. It is not when it was a false alarm.

I had my credit card declined at a gas station because of a false fraud alarm. Fortunately, I had another credit card to pay for the gas that was pumped.

I called BMO up and asked what was going on. I was told two uses at the same gas station in one day is suspicious.

Yes, credit card could have been skimmed and the attendant was trying to put a charge on the card later in the day. But, I could have been running low on gas on the way out to work and bought some gas in the morning. On the way home after work, I see that gas prices dropped and decided fill up at the same station.  

I've had this happen to me. Ahead of the work week I would often fill up one car on a Sunday afternoon, come home and then take my wife's car out to fill up at the same gas station. Got denied a couple times so now I use a separate card for the second transaction.

OTOH I've also had genuinely suspicious transactions sail right through, e.g. me buying gasoline in western Ontario while someone at almost the same moment is buying gas in southern Quebec (courtesy of scammers putting stolen numbers on MBNA card blanks). My card didn't get automatically shut down until it had almost $3K of bogus purchases on it.

So sometimes the fraud detection algos work, and sometimes they don't

Londonguy said

I've had this happen to me. Ahead of the work week I would often fill up one car on a Sunday afternoon, come home and then take my wife's car out to fill up at the same gas station. Got denied a couple times so now I use a separate card for the second transaction.

OTOH I've also had genuinely suspicious transactions sail right through, e.g. me buying gasoline in western Ontario while someone at almost the same moment is buying gas in southern Quebec (courtesy of scammers putting stolen numbers on MBNA card blanks). My card didn't get automatically shut down until it had almost $3K of bogus purchases on it.

So sometimes the fraud detection algos work, and sometimes they don't  

We've had problems with BMO card as well, although not so much recently. Their excuse was that shopping at two or more DIFFERENT food stores in one day was suspicious. They did this to us every Christmas for a few years, so that you couldn't go to both a grocery sore and a specialty store, let alone more. There you are at the till with all your stuff and people lined up behind you, and no-go. We pointed out that we did this kind of shopping regularly and in particular every December. It was annoying calling them on the spot and talking to a live human who gave robotic answers. All they had to do was quickly scan our purchases for the previous December and they would see that this pattern, at the same stores, was repeated, but they were not willing to help in any way. We had to use another card. BMO eventually agreed to give us the points we would have earned if we'd been able to use their card and perhaps some bonus points (can't remember) - better than nothing.

Must depend on the card, I've got CIBC Dividend VISA, often gas up up to 4 vehicles the same day when the price is down, never had a problem.

Rick said
If you wrote a cheque for $1,000,000.00 on your Motive Account for deposit to another FI, do you think they would bounce it? Doubt it....same deal with a pull. Regularly go over Tangerines limits by pulling from Motive.
Open a Motive Chequing account if you haven't already. I wouldn't want to link my Saavy Savings to another FI and transfers between Motive accounts don't count against your monthly limit.  

Actually, EFTs are more risky from that perspective, as there's no paper trail of the requestor's signature, so it's unlikely you'll find any financial institution with a $1 million plus push limit. Thus, the discussion on theoretical incoming credit limits, while interesting, is largely mooted.

Cheers,
Doug

Just a footnote here...

The Cha Ching chequing pays less interest 0.25% instead of 0.60% for the regular chequing.

The main difference I can see is the Cha Ching allows unlimited e-transfer which technically means you can move out 3k per day instantly with no charges.

Since I keep my funds in the savvy savings (at 1.25%) the cha ching made the most sense to give me instant access without fees (vie e-transfer) to my funds when needed.

-------------------------

Footnote: everything above is no longer the case since I now moved my savings to Canadian Tire at 1.55% but I kept all the accounts open just in case the industry leading interest comes back to Motive.

It really is unfortunate because Motive has far better services than Canadian Tire.

Yup am aware of that and that is where account linking comes in.

But free e-transfer comes in handy to move 3k up to 20k per month super fast with no hold time.

mustang said

. . .

Seems to me that this would qualify as some sort of theft
.  

'Theft' ❓❗

It's more like; 'Withholding of Funds', until the Income Tax Act is complied with.

No FI (or FI customer) is above the law ... at least not here in Canada.

Dean

Then explain to me they have my SIN ,I have been with them for like 10 years and this is the second time in a few years they have requested this form.
I have accounts with EQ, Peoples, Outlook ,Alterna and RBC and have never had to supply this info and they all send info T5's every year to the CRA
Why them and not any other bank
Oh and I have a 5 year GIC that pays monthly and is 3 years in paying 3.38% which I transfer into savvy

NEVER heard of a RC-518 form. And I have dozens of accounts everywhere (as I suspect many here do). What is it?