TD Direct Investing GIC Rates | GIC discussions | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
TD Direct Investing GIC Rates
April 15, 2022
9:51 am
christinad
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 314
Member Since:
October 15, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

When I looked at the rates it was 3.65 for a 5 year on the rate sheet. Doesn’t that seem wrong?

April 15, 2022
10:24 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6676
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

That doesn't sound out of place.

On BMO InvestorLine, the best 5-year rate is 3.76% from issuer Canadian Tire Bank.

Equitable Bank is offering 5-year GIC's there at 3.71%. They are 3.85% through its own EQ Bank site.

Bank of Montreal and related issuers are offering their 5-year GIC's there at 3.60%.

Through the deposit brokers channel, Home Trust is offering 5-year GIC's at 3.74% and not at the 4% through its own Oaken Financial channel.

April 15, 2022
10:38 am
christinad
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 314
Member Since:
October 15, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Wow! Thanks. Who knows how high it will be when i'm ready to renew ladder in december. I'm mad i bought last year though.

April 15, 2022
11:51 am
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9213
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

i must be missing someting. Why would you want to buy a five year GIC through an investment broker?

April 15, 2022
12:02 pm
savemoresaveoften
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2747
Member Since:
March 30, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Loonie said
i must be missing someting. Why would you want to buy a five year GIC through an investment broker?  

self directed registered acct etc ?

April 15, 2022
12:49 pm
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3890
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Brokers offer a buffet of issuers, some people prefer to spend their time doing other than transferring money around, opening accounts at various fi's, etc, etc, i.e. convenient and time-saving.

Also large choice of issuers useful if up against CDIC limits, can diversify among fi's easily.

Probably other reasons too.

April 15, 2022
3:01 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9213
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I see. We live in peculiar times but normally the GICs offered through investment brokers pay less, often significantly less, than those you can get elsewhere, making the extra effort worthwhile. Aside from that, one can do better through deposit brokers, at least for non-registered. You can set up an account with a deposit broker in the same way you set one up with an investment broker, and then you don't have to do much after that except pick the GICs you want and send in the cheque by courier (which they pay for in my experience) or give instructions over the phone for a new GIC.

I just thought that people had investment accounts because they wanted to invest in other things than GICs. Tying up your money there for five years in a GIC doesn't seem to fit.

Maybe it works better for registered accounts, but still seems a strange way of doing things to me. If I could be convinced it was an improvement, I'd open one, but so far I don't see it as a useful tool.

Perhaps it's useful if you already have the brokerage account, but, still, five years is a long lock-up for an investment account.

April 15, 2022
3:25 pm
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2786
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Some folk (like me) only want ONE account of each kind such as a RRSP or TFSA, in which case, that account could have a range of investments from stocks to ETFs to mutual funds to bonds and GICs where a GIC ladder may well represent all or most of their fixed income allocation. GIC rates often beat bond yields, especially bond yields in the A+ credit rating range.

I've had GICs on and off for 30+ years in my DIY investment brokerage accounts. Since they typically are at most 5 year terms, they can be the shortest held securities in a brokerage account where buy and hold investors hold some securities for decades at a time.

The interest rate spread between brokerage accounts and online banks and CUs often is in the range of 20-30 bp due to the commission paid by the GIC issuer to the order taker (brokerage) but more recently, the spreads have been close to zero or perhaps even inverse. Some GIC issuers may prefer to work with brokerage channels to avoid having to deal directly with the investing public, both in time and resources. I have seen the spreads vary from year to year and from issuer to issuer. There is no set spread.

As of this moment, there are 12 GIC issuers on Scotia iTrade with an Apr 15th yield of 3.7% or higher. CT Bank is 3.76%, Home Equity 3.75%, and Home Trust 3.74%. Scotia companies are 3.7%. I am guessing some will be higher on Monday where there can be a day or two lag relative to the retail postings here on HIS.

April 15, 2022
3:36 pm
christinad
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 314
Member Since:
October 15, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think its simpler from an estate planning and power of attorney perspective. We’ve definitely had the discussion here before that some of the poa access isn’t great for some of those smaller banks. When i’m older i’ll be revisiting some of these policies. I also imagine as i get older i’ll be selling investments to buy fixed income so its simpler just to keep it here when its in a registered account.

April 15, 2022
5:29 pm
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3890
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I agree, if GIC yield was a focus of my overall investing activity I'd not use an investment broker, I'd have to take the time to chase max yield. It's always been a supplemental, minor part of my picture, so doing it via discount broker accounts works easiest me.

I've not noticed what AltaRed has, i.e. over the years GIC yields have been consistently lower via the investment brokers, at least whenever I looked, though at times of rapidly rising rates like now it's true that you can now find today's best rate at the investment broker if one of the fi's they carry is among the leaders in raising rates this week.

April 15, 2022
5:41 pm
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2786
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Almost always lower at brokerages but the spreads have varied and they have been about zero from time to time. Right now CT Bank is 3.76% at Scotia iTrade and 3.76% on a direct basis with CT. The key point is not to make too many assumptions about spread.

For many with a balanced 60/40 portfolio, GICs are unlikely to compromise all the 40%.

April 15, 2022
6:23 pm
COIN
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1106
Member Since:
March 15, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"Maybe it works better for registered accounts"

I think there is a problem if one buys a GIC in a RRIF at an investment dealer. The problem is that the investment dealer will not "break" an unmatured non-redeemable GIC to meet the mandatory minimum payout for those clients older than 71 years old. Yes? No?

April 15, 2022
7:39 pm
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2786
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The RRIF minimum annual withdrawal must occur so they would have too, or prematurely mature the entire GIC, if there is no other choice. At some cost/penalty I imagine.

I recall this question being raised a time or two over the last several years and in one case that I vaguely remember, the brokerage would NOT allow the account holder to commit to a GIC of that duration in the first place if there were no other assets in the account that could be monetized to meet withdrawal needs in the intervening years. Best for the account holder to have that discussion with the brokerage before making the purchase commitment in the first place.

April 15, 2022
8:42 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6676
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I'm not so sure the brokerage would or even could ensure that.

I think the annuitant of a self-directed RRIF is responsible for ensuring that the minimum annual withdrawals can be made, either in cash or in-kind.

That's a beauty of a self-directed RRIF. One has control to decide how the minimum annual withdrawals are funded and aren't tied to some fixed formula, like accrued interest from the least yielding GIC's first followed by principal from the least yielding GIC's.

April 16, 2022
7:15 am
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3890
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The question is is who is responsible for ensuring the minimum comes out every year? I know it's the broker's job to calculate the minimum amount required, not sure whose job it is to ensure it's removed - ?

All I could find on the gov't site is "Starting in the year after the year you establish a RRIF, you have to be paid a yearly minimum amount.............Your carrier calculates the minimum amount based on your age at the beginning of each year." Based on the "have to be paid" wording, plus I've never heard of it being an issue that people aren't taking out enough, my guess is it's a requirement placed on the broker, the "operator" of the registered account. Just a guess.

April 16, 2022
7:48 am
cgouimet
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1448
Member Since:
February 7, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I don't know whose responsibility it is to actually withdraw from RRIF's. I do have the conversation every year with our financial advisor to set the amount if I want more than the minimum which hasn't been the case yet and it it doesn't look like that is going to change for quite some time.

Once we turn 71, both of us in the same year, shifting our RRSP's 100% into RRIF's, I'm guessing we'll want/need less than the minimum. But that is not gong to be possible.

However, with all of our RRSP's, and all of our RRIF's, in one place we'll at least have the ability to choose where the withdrawals come from.

It "appears" that those who have RRIF's in more that one institution need to take minimums from each of those.

CGO
April 16, 2022
8:57 am
MG
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 258
Member Since:
February 16, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Bill said
The question is is who is responsible for ensuring the minimum comes out every year? I know it's the broker's job to calculate the minimum amount required, not sure whose job it is to ensure it's removed - ?   

During 2021, I converted a LIRA to a RLIF, with CIBC Investor's Edge. At the time, I had to specify another account into which the minimum withdrawal amount should be moved (could be a bank account or unregistered account). At year end, CIBC calculated the amount to be withdrawn in 2022 based on the value of the RLIF on December 31, 2021. I also had to specify the date on which the minimum withdrawal was to be made. I will ensure I have the required cash in the account before the withdrawal date. No idea what they would do if I did not have cash sitting there. I am assuming they will move the money since they asked what account it should go into.

April 16, 2022
9:29 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2786
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

cgouimet said
However, with all of our RRSP's, and all of our RRIF's, in one place we'll at least have the ability to choose where the withdrawals come from.

It "appears" that those who have RRIF's in more that one institution need to take minimums from each of those.  

I am not sure about the first part (maybe yes, maybe no depending on institution) but the second part is definitely required. As one example I googled, RBC Direct Investing says the minimum must be taken out of each RRIF.

As regards posts #13, #14, #15, I am guessing CRA makes the FI responsible for ensuring the minimums are withdrawn. The FI's ability to do so is probably in the terms and conditions 'fine print' when the RRIF was opened. I have never checked for that in my own RRIF.

April 16, 2022
9:49 am
cgouimet
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1448
Member Since:
February 7, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

AltaRed said

I am not sure about the first part (maybe yes, maybe no depending on institution) but the second part is definitely required. As one example I googled, RBC Direct Investing says the minimum must be taken out of each RRIF.

As regards posts #13, #14, #15, I am guessing CRA makes the FI responsible for ensuring the minimums are withdrawn. The FI's ability to do so is probably in the terms and conditions 'fine print' when the RRIF was opened. I have never checked for that in my own RRIF.  

I meant within our individual RRIF's. So, in my big RRIF, money market fund or EU equity or AP equity or Cdn equity etc... As I do now within a small RRIF

CGO
April 16, 2022
11:06 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6676
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

AltaRed said

As regards posts #13, #14, #15, I am guessing CRA makes the FI responsible for ensuring the minimums are withdrawn. The FI's ability to do so is probably in the terms and conditions 'fine print' when the RRIF was opened. I have never checked for that in my own RRIF.

The definitions in Income Tax Act 146.3 (1) requires the RRIF carrier to enforce the minimum withdrawals.

Definition of RRIF:

registered retirement income fund means a retirement income fund accepted by the Minister for registration for the purposes of this Act and registered under the Social Insurance Number of the first annuitant under the fund; (fonds enregistré de revenu de retraite)

Definition of retirement income fund:

retirement income fund means an arrangement between a carrier and an annuitant under which, in consideration for the transfer to the carrier of property, the carrier undertakes to pay amounts to the annuitant (and, where the annuitant so elects, to the annuitant’s spouse or common-law partner after the annuitant’s death), the total of which is, in each year in which the minimum amount under the arrangement for the year is greater than nil, not less than the minimum amount under the arrangement for that year, but the amount of any such payment does not exceed the value of the property held in connection with the arrangement immediately before the time of the payment. (fonds de revenu de retraite)

For Scotia iTRADE, the RIF declaration of trust allows the carrier, The Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Company, to liquidate self-directed RIF property, if needed, for making minimum payments, without no liability for any resulting losses:

8. Making Payments

Payments from your Plan begin no earlier than allowed by applicable pension legislation and no later than the last day of the year after the year in which you open the Plan.

We [The Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Company] pay you the amount you choose on your Application provided that (a) if this is a Scotia Self-Directed RIF, Saskatchewan PRRIF or Manitoba PRRIF, the amount must fall between the required minimum amount and the total value of your Plan, ….

In order to make payments to you, we may have to withdraw, liquidate or sell all or part of one or more of your investments prior to their maturity date. We assume no liability for any losses that result.

No permission to create posts

Please write your comments in the forum.