Banks that don't raise GIC rates will be stuck in a liquidity crisis | GIC discussions | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Banks that don't raise GIC rates will be stuck in a liquidity crisis
September 7, 2022
6:44 pm
Hellohello
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 21
Member Since:
September 4, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

You're a bank Cfo thinking I'll gyp term deposit holders by making them pay in low rate savings accounts (use to be called hisa). Then a liquidity crisis hits, markets freeze up, but this time the government doesn't come to your rescue without onerous demands. You'd be able to weather the storm had you locked up term deposits. Now, you'll have to pay through the nose for months 7 8 9% while the public demands banks not be bailed out.

September 7, 2022
6:51 pm
HermanH
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1164
Member Since:
April 14, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hellohello said
Then a liquidity crisis hits, markets freeze up, but this time the government doesn't come to your rescue without onerous demands.

And when has that ever happened in the past?
As bad as the crisis was in 2008, even then, the Fed refused to ask anyone holding toxic sub-prime loans and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) to take a 'haircut'.

September 7, 2022
7:57 pm
COIN
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1109
Member Since:
March 15, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think Home Trust/Bank ran into a liquidity crisis a few years ago when depositors made a "run on the bank".

They had a mismatched book where they were funding long term mortgages with short term deposits.

September 7, 2022
8:23 pm
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2885
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Home Capital Group ran into a liquidity crisis in 2017. The run was triggered by some anomalies in their mortgage underwriting and depositors started pulling their holdings in savings (such as Oaken Financial). Warren Buffett bailed them out on onerous terms. Post-crisis, Oaken in particular decreased its HISA rates relative to its GIC rates, at least for some period of time to reduce that exposure.

Financial institutions who have extraordinarily high HISA rates must either be laying off that risk in some way with counterparties, or possibly living further on the edge than their peers.

September 7, 2022
8:55 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6769
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It is better to search for another bank that is looking for more deposit money and is willing to offer better rates.

Otherwise, the bank CFO doesn't care. He knows first hand that when the bank tried to raise $500 million in deposit notes in February, around $1 billion came calling! He had to turn away $500 million in deposits that the bank didn't need.

September 7, 2022
9:11 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6769
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Home Trust's run back then was caused by a smear campaign by short sellers. The campaign succeeded in scaring people who had a significant amount of Home Trust deposits that were uninsured as the deposits were over the $100,000 CDIC deposit insurance limit.

It didn't look like Home Trust was watching carefully how much of their savings deposits in their brokerage ISA was over deposit insurance limits.

To avoid that kind of situation, lots of online banks now have a limit on savings account deposits.

September 8, 2022
12:44 am
HermanH
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1164
Member Since:
April 14, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

AltaRed said Financial institutions who have extraordinarily high HISA rates must either be laying off that risk in some way with counterparties, or possibly living further on the edge than their peers.  

Maybe they are doing this:
How to rob a bank (from the inside, that is)

September 8, 2022
4:12 am
savemoresaveoften
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2875
Member Since:
March 30, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hellohello said
You're a bank Cfo thinking I'll gyp term deposit holders by making them pay in low rate savings accounts (use to be called hisa). Then a liquidity crisis hits, markets freeze up, but this time the government doesn't come to your rescue without onerous demands. You'd be able to weather the storm had you locked up term deposits. Now, you'll have to pay through the nose for months 7 8 9% while the public demands banks not be bailed out.  

One will never make it to become a bank cfo if all they do is pay high rates to shore up capital cuz they worry about the next liquidity crisis….

September 8, 2022
5:26 am
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 824
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

This reads like wishful thinking.

I have never been a bank CFO, so the following is pure speculation… I am guessing that CFOs have multiple ways of balancing liabilities and assets. Like issuing bonds and other similar instruments. And if Bank of Canada pays about 3.5% on a 5 year bond, TD can issue bonds with rates only marginally higher and it would be snapped up. Smaller institutions have to pay a bit more but not a whole lot unless they are already in distress.

So why would the banks pay more on term deposits? There could be good regulatory and taxation reasons but its not going to push the needle much. And some institutions might not be able to issue bonds; they would be the ones to pay a bit more for GICs but BoC bonds are still likely to be the benchmark.

So for 5 year GICs to start paying more, the market needs to change its current thinking to “Bank of Canada is not going to be able to deliver on 2% inflation. Not this year, not next, not in 2024”. Then investors won’t buy 5 year bonds at 3.5%. Then 5 year GICs would pay more. But not until then.

…but like I say, the above is just speculation. I dont really know.

September 8, 2022
5:37 am
Hellohello
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 21
Member Since:
September 4, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Norman1 said
Otherwise, the bank CFO doesn't care. He knows first hand that when the bank tried to raise $500 million in deposit notes in February, around $1 billion came calling! He had to turn away $500 million in deposits that the bank didn't need.  

"Investors have been dumping government bonds this year, and they are dumping bonds from America’s top companies even faster." Wsj Sept 8/22

September 8, 2022
5:56 am
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 824
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

For investors to “dump”, investors have to buy. So, the other way to read this ls “ Investors have been buying government bonds this year, and they are buying bonds from America’s top companies even faster." Wsj Sept 8/22 (amended)

September 8, 2022
7:59 am
canadian.100
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 944
Member Since:
September 7, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Sounds like my neighbour who “dumped” his house because it needed big repairs. Of course there was a buyer.

September 8, 2022
8:41 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6769
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

There's no dumping of bonds. That's just fake drama.

As mordko wrote, there is a buyer for each bond "dumped". Some of that $500 million turned away by Equitable Bank earlier in the year may be among the buyers.

As well, most bonds don't trade. They are bought by institutional buyers and held to maturity in investment pools for their products.

September 8, 2022
9:52 am
Hellohello
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 21
Member Since:
September 4, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

That's a new one lower prices don't matter. I guess not when equity holders expect to be bailed out. It feels like that still.

canadian.100 said
Sounds like my neighbour who “dumped” his house because it needed big repairs. Of course there was a buyer.  

Right he got 15% less than last year for example

Norman1 said
There's no dumping of bonds. That's just fake drama.

Lower prices is fake?

Those bonds dumped at discount prices. It be like buying a $50 stock one day, the next day a buyer decided to sell for 40 and the rest follow.

September 8, 2022
3:34 pm
savemoresaveoften
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2875
Member Since:
March 30, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hellohello said
That's a new one lower prices don't matter. I guess not when equity holders expect to be bailed out. It feels like that still.

Right he got 15% less than last year for example

Norman1 said
There's no dumping of bonds. That's just fake drama.

Lower prices is fake?

Those bonds dumped at discount prices. It be like buying a $50 stock one day, the next day a buyer decided to sell for 40 and the rest follow.  

do u even know what discounted price means ..... sigh

they trade at market price, whatever the market is.

you need to learn how the investment community works or just become a laugh here .....

September 8, 2022
5:37 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6769
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I agree: Lower price is not dumping!

Is Loblaws dumping potatoes when they have a sale? Are people dumping their three year old car when they sell it for 40% less than what they paid for the car new?

The drop in price of bonds after interest rate goes up is a natural adjustment and not dumping. Investors expect a discount on a 2% five-year bond issued last year that has four years left to maturity when freshly issued four-year bonds now pay 3%.

The price is expected to be around 96.257% of face value so that the buyer of the 2% bond will end up with a yield to maturity of 3%.

September 8, 2022
6:31 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6769
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

AltaRed said

Financial institutions who have extraordinarily high HISA rates must either be laying off that risk in some way with counterparties, or possibly living further on the edge than their peers.

HermanH said
Maybe they are doing this:
How to rob a bank (from the inside, that is)

Fraud isn't necessary. There are lots of lending that is more specialized and have higher rates.

Home Trust and Equitable Bank specialize in near-prime mortgages that the regular banks reject. They charge such borrowers more because they know such borrowers won't qualify for a prime mortgage at a bank or credit union.

Another example is Peoples Trust's First Inheritance probate loans to front the probate taxes, often needed to be paid up front, to get that grant of probate from the probate court. $5,000 placement fee + 15.99% per annum interest for up to one year term. One can easily pay an extra ½% per annum on deposits if one is funding 15.99% per annum loans instead of 5.29% prime 5-year residential mortgages!

Canadian Western Bank, who are behind Motive Financial, focuses on commercial lending instead of personal lending. Commercial mortgages are larger and have higher rates than residential mortgages.

September 14, 2022
11:31 pm
RetirEd
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1013
Member Since:
November 18, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Existing tradeable bonds are appreciated/discounted to the price that new bonds at current rates would yield at their existing maturity. For some customers, there may also be slight effects from the ability to get a shorter or longer term.

Think about a buyer facing a current new-bond yield of 4% who may find it attractive to buy an existing bond with time to go at 5%. He may be willing to pay an appreciated price for that higher-yield bond.
RetirEd

RetirEd

Please write your comments in the forum.