Why do you live frugally? | Page 2 | General financial discussion | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Why do you live frugally?
August 20, 2017
9:15 am
JenE
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 416
Member Since:
May 24, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Max said

My parents were middle class stay-at-home mom and my father was upholster in the aeronautic industry so all the friends I have come from middle class and can't understand my situation. Wealth is a good but dangerous thing for social relations. As you say, it's better kept secret in the family and friends. However, I don't mind being envied by jealous people on online forums, this doesn't affect my social life.  

Well said, Max. I've always thought that what other people have makes no difference to my life, I'm just happy to have what I have and to be in a position to be charitable to those in need.

August 20, 2017
11:52 am
Max
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 208
Member Since:
November 26, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It is not worth incorporating anymore since the laws are changing on the 31st of December.

You will no longuer be able to give dividends to your kids over 18 years old. That was not my plan since my kids are 4, 2 and 1 years old. But right now it is still possible to give 60 000$ dividends to your kids in charge or any family member that you have in charge that is over 18 years old and pay the low tax bracket on this income.

The reason I incorporated is to build a retirement plan since I don't have any because I'm self-employed. So instead of touching all my salary now and pay 53% taxes on the high bracket, I invest in stock options and real estates so only my profits are taxed at 53%. So any income I have of rentals or from selling stocks gets hit by 53% tax rate which is fair since it wasn't taxed full blast in the beggining. However, when I retire and I want to pay myself a crazy salary or dividends, I will still pay 53% taxes. It's just a big RRSP. But instead of the company you work for investing 50% in your RRSP and yourself contributing 50%, you contribute 100% with a 22.5% taxation rate which used to be 19% lat year. What used to be unfair since 2005 is the paying dividends to family members. So you could give dividends yo all your 5 children 60k each so 300k total and avoid the 53% bracket. IMO it was the dishonest part but on the 31st of December, this tax loophole ends. A lot of staffs I used to work with in the 5 last years are living on the edge by extracting the maximum possible with those tax loopholes and will have to reduce their lifestyle in 2018.

For personnal inc to be worth it you need to have no depts, not need to touch all the corporate revenues and need to have deductible expanditures.

The day you become free is the day you work for fun.

August 20, 2017
12:54 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6750
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Max said
It is not worth incorporating anymore since the laws are changing on the 31st of December.

You will no longuer be able to give dividends to your kids over 18 years old. That was not my plan since my kids are 4, 2 and 1 years old. But right now it is still possible to give 60 000$ dividends to your kids in charge or any family member that you have in charge that is over 18 years old and pay the low tax bracket on this income.

That's what the government calls "income sprinkling".

According to Financial Post (July 21, 2017): What the new ‘income sprinkling’ rules mean for tax planning, before 1999, a private corporation could sprinkle income to toddlers:


When it comes to dividends, however, there is no reasonableness test in that anyone who owns share of the corporation may receive dividends. There is, however, a special tax known as the “kiddie tax” which came into place in 1999, to prevent income splitting with minor children (i.e. kids under the age of 18). Prior to this tax, known formally as “tax on split income” (TOSI), it was quite common for private companies to pay tens of thousands of dollars in dividends to toddlers, which would effectively be received tax-free [to the kids, not to the corporation] as the kids would use their basic personal amount to shelter this income from tax.

August 20, 2017
8:07 pm
Jon
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 417
Member Since:
August 9, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I have one drastic and radical solution to your problem Max, simply permanently move to another province with much lower tax (Alberta for instance) when you retire; than instead of 52%, the tax rate maybe around 30% sf-cool

August 20, 2017
8:53 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6750
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Max may need to move further away than just Alberta for significant savings in income taxes. sf-frown

No matter where in Canada one resides, the federal marginal tax rate of 33% applies to taxable income over $202,800. Alberta will be asking for an additional 14% or 15%.

August 20, 2017
10:48 pm
Jon
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 417
Member Since:
August 9, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Norman1 said
Max may need to move further away than just Alberta for significant savings in income taxes. sf-frown

No matter where in Canada one resides, the federal marginal tax rate of 33% applies to taxable income over $202,800. Alberta will be asking for an additional 14% or 15%.  

Yik ! That difference is too small to make the trip worthwhile.
Max can try to structure everything as capital gain, maybe he can ask his company to buy back share from him at a price that is higher than the initial price of the company.
Lawyers and accountants will be required for this

August 21, 2017
5:01 am
Saver-Mom
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 311
Member Since:
December 12, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I am fine with the govt closing loopholes for self employed incorporated individuals who are not really running a business, not really employing their family members etc. The wealthy should pay their fair share of tax. But it is unfair to put increasingly higher tax burdens on the higher wage earners. And the self employed should be allowed to grow a retirement fund in line with their earnings, not limited to a measly $25K per year in rrsp. That would allow saving for retirement in an honest way. Get rid of the registered designations on accounts, which just make managing money difficult, and allow reporting on tax returns a substantial sum that would be exempt from taxation, eg $100K per year of new money, cumulatively, for 30 years. There's your 3 million dollar retirement fund, plus interest.

August 21, 2017
8:53 am
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3911
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Governments so far seem to want to limit annual pension contributions to be about $25K. Employees (no matter how much they make) and employers have annual limits on pension plan contributions, I believe the limit between the two is about that $25K per year. Allowing $100K for self-employed would not be in line with the limits for T4 earners.

August 21, 2017
2:23 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9235
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

$3 million, tax-EXEMPT??

The point of registered retirement plans is that the tax is deferred until the funds are withdrawn.

There is, effectively, a tax exemption, for the first 20K or so of income for seniors in place now. I think that's enough.

Whatever it is, I think it should be the same for everyone. Same with RSP contributions. I've never understood why it had to be a percentage of income. If you can save more for retirement and want to use RSPs, then so be it, but only on a tax-deferred basis.

August 21, 2017
4:30 pm
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3911
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

That would be cool, I put every nickel of savings into my "retirement plan" (it's always available if I really need to dip into it), get my yearly taxable income down to as close to $12K or wherever taxes start as I can, further gains and income sheltered for decades (government can figure out its own cash-flow issues in the meantime), until I need to begin drawing it down. I like it.

August 21, 2017
5:41 pm
Saver-Mom
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 311
Member Since:
December 12, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Sure, $25K savings for someone who works 50 years is 1.25 million, so just increase that to 3 million. Of course I should have said deferred, not exempt, as it would be subject to being taxed when withdrawn, so likely over 50%. And let it be for all, employees as well as self-employed. Incorporated or not. You just have to earn enough and save enough!

August 21, 2017
7:03 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9235
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Glad to know you only meant tax-deferred.
The gov't will get its slice in due course. They may even get more than they do now, but people would potentially be better protected for the long term. Any social benefits entitlements would have to be based on total income. There might even need to be some provision in that regard for total assets, but I am not sure about that as I haven't done any calculations. I'm sure it could be all worked out if there were a will to do so.

August 21, 2017
8:00 pm
Saver-Mom
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 311
Member Since:
December 12, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Fewer people are and will be eligible for pensions. This is my response to Max's question: I live frugally now to provide myself with comfort down the road.

August 22, 2017
9:38 am
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9235
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

By the time you've gotten closer to the end of "the road", you may find, as I have, that the habits are so ingrained that it's almost impossible to act otherwise. I have become so good at saving money that it's second nature and anything else would make me uncomfortable.
Maybe I have a problem.sf-confused

Other reasons: Although it started with fear of poverty and the way I was raised, I enjoy the challenge and the sense of accomplishment. But it is probably a minority of people who feel this way. I often find myself quite surprised at how readily the people around me spend money. Many of their expenditures would never enter my mind as I see no value in them and no need for them. The last time I remember buying a cup of coffee was about 50 years ago. I probably buy a cup of tea or a soft drink once or twice a month, but could easily do without them. But I have no hesitation buying expensive comfortable durable shoes - just not too many of them!sf-smile

August 22, 2017
10:03 am
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3911
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Loonie, I get what you're saying but I wonder if it's habit or more just the fact our individual true natures don't change. Give kids, even those in the same family, an allowance and right off the bat some are parsimonious, some are profligate, and everything in between - it seems to be set very early to a large degree. And spenders will always be very happy to make quick use of any money bequeathed to them so, like deferred taxes, look at it as deferred spending.

August 22, 2017
3:13 pm
JustMe2016
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 129
Member Since:
October 21, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

My dear Max, a better question to ask would be; why do you feel the need to justify the way you live? As clearly, this is what you are doing by asking why are you frugal? Obviously, the answer to your true question is easy to reply to. You feel guilty about your chosen lifestyle. Maybe acquaintances of yours have made remarks or innuendoes?

It is never easy to walk your own path. Not to be a sheep and to not follow the herd around you. But you shouldn't feel the need to justify your lifestyle. You will definitely be happier if you can come to peace with the decisions you made. After all, first and foremost, you are living this life for your own self. It doesn't prevent you to be extremely concerned about others, but it doesn't change the fact that this is your life, you have your lessons to learn, just like your wife and children have their own lessons to learn.

Now to answer the question you were not really asking; true and long-lasting happiness comes from within, not from without. Only fools believe that money brings happiness. Money is both a friend and an enemy.

I don't like labels, I know that they are extremely destructive and this in spite of the fact we use millions of them every single day. So I will not use the word frugal, or thrifty. I will simply say that I find little comfort in material things. After all, love is all there is to have.

You can believe me or not, it is all fine. But in regards to the environment and this planet, here's how things will unfold. First of all, in regards to the environment, it is way too late. The train has left the station more than 100 years ago. Moreover, you can't logically reconcile a materialistic society with the environment.

The bottom line is the planet will survive, but the people on it, won't. Now there is nothing to be overly concerned about. In some hundreds, or thousands of years, there won't be a single human being on this planet, yes, all will be 'dead'. But after a long period of rest, a new race will start. Believe it or not, but it has happened before and will happen again.

Things get a lot easier when people stop believing in lies. This current life of yours is just one of the hundreds, if not thousands of incarnations your soul will have. As Pierre Teilhard de Chardin once wrote, (I paraphrase); we are not physical beings currently having a spiritual experience, but spiritual beings currently having a physical experience.

The bottom line is you are responsible for all your thoughts, words and actions. You are here to learn, to grow. Life, in the end, is nothing more than a school. Whatever you screw up in this life, you will be provided with an infinite number of opportunities until you do it right in future incarnations. Nevertheless, it is highly desirable to do things right as soon as possible since going thru the birth process is not the most pleasant and easy experience. Never do harm to another as anything you give will eventually come back to you. Such is the Law of Cause and Effect.

And in closing, let me tell you a bit more about me; I don't consume caffeine or alcohol. I don't eat meat, fish or crustaceans and I'm not religious. In fact, it baffles me that people need to put Jesus, God, Allah and Muhammad in a box called religion.

Hope it helps.

August 22, 2017
5:37 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9235
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Bill said
Loonie, I get what you're saying but I wonder if it's habit or more just the fact our individual true natures don't change. Give kids, even those in the same family, an allowance and right off the bat some are parsimonious, some are profligate, and everything in between - it seems to be set very early to a large degree. And spenders will always be very happy to make quick use of any money bequeathed to them so, like deferred taxes, look at it as deferred spending.  

Yes, I'm sure there is truth in this. I have no real basis of comparison, but I remember friends at university who seemed to have no concern at all for where the next dollar was coming from even though they did not come from wealthy families. I could not comprehend this.
It's also true that as a child I enjoyed saving (perhaps hoarding would be a better word!) far more than buying. If you kept the money, you got to enjoy it over and over again, as it was always there to admire its potential and imagine various uses for. And the longer you kept it, the more it grew (interest, birthday gifts etc), and the bigger your imagination could be. Eventually, maybe it could take you to university (my biggest goal from an early age). Once you spent it, the fun of possibility was over.

I read about a study a few years ago which apparently showed that kids who could accept delayed gratification had better life outcomes (or something similar). I can't remember the details, but it made sense to me. The person who can wait has more choices.

August 22, 2017
6:09 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6750
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Loonie said

I read about a study a few years ago which apparently showed that kids who could accept delayed gratification had better life outcomes (or something similar). I can't remember the details, but it made sense to me. The person who can wait has more choices.  

Sounds familiar. A Google search turned up psychologist Walter Mischel and his Marshmallow Test: The Atlantic (September 2014): What the Marshmallow Test Really Teaches About Self-Control.

August 22, 2017
6:45 pm
mmlt
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 164
Member Since:
February 4, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

JustMe2016 said
My dear Max, a better question to ask would be; why do you feel the need to justify the way you live? As clearly, this is what you are doing by asking why are you frugal? Obviously, the answer to your true question is easy to reply to. You feel guilty about your chosen lifestyle. Maybe acquaintances of yours have made remarks or innuendoes?

It is never easy to walk your own path. Not to be a sheep and to not follow the herd around you. But you shouldn't feel the need to justify your lifestyle. You will definitely be happier if you can come to peace with the decisions you made. After all, first and foremost, you are living this life for your own self. It doesn't prevent you to be extremely concerned about others, but it doesn't change the fact that this is your life, you have your lessons to learn, just like your wife and children have their own lessons to learn.

Now to answer the question you were not really asking; true and long-lasting happiness comes from within, not from without. Only fools believe that money brings happiness. Money is both a friend and an enemy.

I don't like labels, I know that they are extremely destructive and this in spite of the fact we use millions of them every single day. So I will not use the word frugal, or thrifty. I will simply say that I find little comfort in material things. After all, love is all there is to have.

You can believe me or not, it is all fine. But in regards to the environment and this planet, here's how things will unfold. First of all, in regards to the environment, it is way too late. The train has left the station more than 100 years ago. Moreover, you can't logically reconcile a materialistic society with the environment.

The bottom line is the planet will survive, but the people on it, won't. Now there is nothing to be overly concerned about. In some hundreds, or thousands of years, there won't be a single human being on this planet, yes, all will be 'dead'. But after a long period of rest, a new race will start. Believe it or not, but it has happened before and will happen again.

Things get a lot easier when people stop believing in lies. This current life of yours is just one of the hundreds, if not thousands of incarnations your soul will have. As Pierre Teilhard de Chardin once wrote, (I paraphrase); we are not physical beings currently having a spiritual experience, but spiritual beings currently having a physical experience.

The bottom line is you are responsible for all your thoughts, words and actions. You are here to learn, to grow. Life, in the end, is nothing more than a school. Whatever you screw up in this life, you will be provided with an infinite number of opportunities until you do it right in future incarnations. Nevertheless, it is highly desirable to do things right as soon as possible since going thru the birth process is not the most pleasant and easy experience. Never do harm to another as anything you give will eventually come back to you. Such is the Law of Cause and Effect.

And in closing, let me tell you a bit more about me; I don't consume caffeine or alcohol. I don't eat meat, fish or crustaceans and I'm not religious. In fact, it baffles me that people need to put Jesus, God, Allah and Muhammad in a box called religion.

Hope it helps.  

Though you wrote this to Max, I felt your words. Beautifully articulated.

August 24, 2017
1:53 am
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9235
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Norman1 said

Sounds familiar. A Google search turned up psychologist Walter Mischel and his Marshmallow Test: The Atlantic (September 2014): What the Marshmallow Test Really Teaches About Self-Control.  

Yes, that was it. Thanks for finding, so that we don't have to listen to someone rant about not citing chapter and verse.

As I re-read the marshmallow test, I think the commentators and maybe even the psychologist are missing something.

The point is made that some kids may not wait for two marshmallows or cupcakes or whatever is used, for various logical reasons.

When I read about this a few years ago, my first reaction was that since I have never liked marshmallows, I probably would not have waited for two of them.

But now I am pretty sure that, even though I don't like them, in real life I would have waited for two. I would be thinking about what I could do with them, and two is better than one. Maybe I could trade them for much-preferred caramels or chocolate or to influence someone to do something I wanted, etc. I might also be thinking about what I would do with the twenty minutes. I think this may be the reason that the results of the test seem to hold regardless of various reasons why kids might not want to wait for two.

Some of us will overcome our disinterest or whatever because we can see a bigger picture wherein two might be useful and we can make it painless to get two. This suggests creativity, adaptability, flexibility, which may be correlated with better life outcomes.

If there's one thing that the people on highinterestsavings seem to have in common, it's the ability to work creatively with rules, to work the angles, in order to get the best deal for themselves!

Would we all have waited for two marshmallows as well? It's hard to say as we're no longer 4 years old.

No permission to create posts

Please write your comments in the forum.