S.E. BC 'Elevatus Credit Union Project' Called Off. :-( | General financial discussion | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
S.E. BC 'Elevatus Credit Union Project' Called Off. :-(
July 8, 2021
1:30 pm
Dean
Valhalla Mountains, British Columbia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1914
Member Since:
January 12, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

.
Sad news for us forum members here who live in S.E. British Columbia :

What a shame sf-confused

    Dean

sf-cool " Live Long, Healthy ... And Prosper! " sf-cool

July 26, 2021
5:55 pm
Dean
Valhalla Mountains, British Columbia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1914
Member Since:
January 12, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

.
Well I'll be ... it looks like I'm the Only forum member here who lives in the S.E. corner of British Columbia (Kootenay Districts). sf-frown

Who'da thought ❗

    Dean

sf-cool " Live Long, Healthy ... And Prosper! " sf-cool

September 17, 2021
12:40 pm
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2884
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Bringing this back up given the discussion in a new proposed MB merger of 3 CUs in https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/hubert-financial/merger-discussions-are-underway/ Knowing all the noted SEBC communities a bit, I believe the merger of 6 would have been the right thing to do to reach critical mass with $3?B in assets but I think it failed because a merger of 6 was too big to get arms around and there may not have been an overly dominant member in the 6 entities.

I think they will try again but maybe only 3 of them initially, get processes and policies and systems ironed out, and then bring others back in on a one by one basis using the platform of the larger entity. There is no reason for all of SEBC to have more than one CU.

September 17, 2021
2:52 pm
Dean
Valhalla Mountains, British Columbia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1914
Member Since:
January 12, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

.
Agreed , AltaRed ... trying to merge 6 CU's into one (all at once), was probably 'two or three bridges too far'.

I hope they try again, but next time hopefully they'll limit it to three or four CU's, and the rest can follow later in the future.

    Dean

sf-cool " Live Long, Healthy ... And Prosper! " sf-cool

September 17, 2021
5:08 pm
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2884
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I would hope so. It is a large region https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/data/geographic/land-use/administrative-boundaries/census-boundaries/development-region/map_development_region_kootenay_4.pdf with maybe 150-160k population spread over a dozen 'towns' mostly along Highway 3.

It just makes sense the 6 CUs servicing this region would be more effective as one allowing more diversification in lending and no one CU being overly vulnerable to single industry collapses.

Please write your comments in the forum.