RRSP deduction strategy | General financial discussion | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
RRSP deduction strategy
April 16, 2015
12:18 am
yuj
Ontario
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 33
Member Since:
March 2, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

There is an enormous amount of knowledge and experience here so thought I'd post a perplexity with RRSP claim strategy, appreciate any thoughts that may be provided.

Someone 52, single, RSP/tfsa maxed.
no employment earnings and no social assistance or benefits in the last 3 years
nor expect to have any of these in the next few years or more.
Has about $8000 elligible RSP deduction limit carried for last 4+ years,
about $1500 contributed but unclaimed (overcontribution) carried for 6+ years

Due to good Mutual Fund / ETF capital gains distributions in 2014,
and capital gains from MF's sold in 2014 and resaved to HISA/gic's ...temporary promotional interest rates...
A couple hundred $ tax owed for 2014.

Is it foolish to maybe claim $1500 of unclaimed RSP contribution (and reduce tax owing by couple $) so won't have to potentially withdraw the
overcontribution if it is never deducted?

April 16, 2015
3:12 am
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9235
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think you can only claim it against employment income, making the claim impossible against investment income.

I believe, however, that there is a form you can get from CRA that you can fill out down the road when the $1500 has to be withdrawn, to show that it was already taxed (i.e. not claimed), so as to avoid being taxed twice on it. For that purpose, you should probably make sure it always stays in a separate account, and hang on to the paper work. I'm not sure how this works for any profits gained in the interim, but would assume they would still get taxed upon withdrawal, so you would need to be able to show it clearly separated from other RRSPs.

I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong about this.

April 16, 2015
5:57 am
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3911
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Yuj, I'm no expert on RRSPs so forgive me - how can you have $8K deduction limit available but have an "overcontribution"? Are you saying you've contributed $1500, just not yet deducted it against the $8K available?

I believe T1-OVP form can be filed to remove excess contributions, T3012 can be filed to remove without withholding tax.

RRSP amount deducted on line 208 of your return is a deduction from total income, i.e. not just employment income.

April 16, 2015
8:32 am
yuj
Ontario
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 33
Member Since:
March 2, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I presume from the last fuller yr of work 6 yrs ago, about 8000 deduction limit was calculated to be allowed to claim against income for the following year, (but it never seemed useful to make a claim that following year or any of the last subsequent years due to little income). The overcontribution fell within the 2000 overcontribution allowance, and it was made at least 6 years ago and lumped together with all rsp contribution/investments.

I think the idea (and certainly the greater tax reduction) is to claim RSP contributions against employment income, but I think one can still claim contributions if you are within your deduction limit just to get the tax free compounding benefit, (which is what got me into rsp contributions since I was 20 yrs old with continuinng part time income and no immediate tax reduction benefit).

It seems the rsp wizard shows that claiming 1300 has no effect on 2014 tax owing but claiming 1500 does reduce it by a big $3. (there was an odd day of work income last year).

I wonder if using the overcontribution up now is the save time effective way to deal with the overcontribution , pay the rsp redemption income tax in the future vs filing the appropriate form for withdrawal of the overcontribution with no withholding tax now or within the future?
Income not expected to be higher in the future, but wonder if tax rates will increase for investment /rsp income in the future.

April 16, 2015
8:42 am
kanaka
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1232
Member Since:
December 23, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Have you considered withdrawing your RRSP and place it into TFSA?

April 16, 2015
10:48 am
2of3aintbad
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 317
Member Since:
February 24, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

kanaka said

Have you considered withdrawing your RRSP and place it into TFSA?

OP indicated his TFSA is maxed. Although it is appealing to withdraw from the RRSP because of his/her tax situation now, if the money is not needed, I might wait until 65 to convert to a RIF and get the pension tax credit. But definitely do not claim the unused contribution since there is no harm in deferring. The situation may be different in the future.

April 16, 2015
1:10 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9235
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think that what the OP may have meant by "overcontribution" is that he/she has exceeded the earned contribution room by $1500, so, in his/her mind, the $1500 is considered somewhat separate when he/she thinks about claiming it. OP does say that the RSP/TFSA are both maxed out. When he/she talks about the $8000, I assume he/she is talking about not having utilized the deduction for money that has already been contributed in the past. The language may not have been precise with the word "limit", but he/she does call it a "deduction limit".

I think that if it has not been claimed before now, that CRA will consider any claim to be part of the $8000 earned contribution room, and therefor it would qualify as a regular contribution, not an overcontribution. Only regular contributions can count for the deduction. Overcontributions up to 2000 may be kept in the RRSP but can't be claimed for a deduction - at least that's my understanding. You will have already paid the tax on the overcontribution when you earned the money, so that shouldn't be an issue as long as there is documentation to reflect that it is an already-taxed overcontribution. I am not sure how you separate that out after this amount has had earnings, however, and you may need to discuss with an accountant.

It sounds like you have, in total, made an overcontribution of 1500, and have also not claimed the 8000 regular contribution which you made some years ago. Thus, for now at least, you have already paid the tax on both of them, so would not be affected by future changes in tax rates for the 8000, as long as you fill out the appropriate form.

It also sounds like you have additional RRSP monies from when you started investing at age 20. And it sounds like all of this money is in one account.

For now, there is no harm in taking the $3, but it obviously doesn't make a lot of difference.

I don't know what your income is right now, from all sources, but if it's low enough, you might find it advantageous to convert all or some of your RRSP money to RRIF at the earliest opportunity. There is no minimum age for converting, but starting at age 55, there would be mandatory withdrawals, which may work out well for you. You can then decide the optimum amount to take out each year above and beyond that, if any. I think the $2000 pension tax credit doesn't start til age 65, but it is a freebie and you can only use it for income from a company pension plan or RIF, so you might want to wait until then. However, if you are anticipating a pension of at least 2000/yr from previous employment (not CPP) then it won't make any difference.

A lot depends on the rest of your financial situation- how much money you have and whether it is registered, what your overall income is, whether you expect more income in future from a pension plan, etc.

April 16, 2015
1:48 pm
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3911
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Annual contribution limits are determined based on earned income. If you look at the T1 you will see that amounts deducted on line 208 are from "total income" (line 150). No idea why only $3 difference - maybe the "wizard" is in error (I do my taxes on paper forms).

April 16, 2015
4:09 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9235
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

My mistake. You're right, Bill. I think I was remembering a different situation.

To avoid confusion (the situation is confusing enough as it is!), I have amended my post above #7 accordingly, and made a few other edits in that post to reflect my current thinking.

April 16, 2015
5:09 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6748
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

yuj said

I presume from the last fuller yr of work 6 yrs ago, about 8000 deduction limit was calculated to be allowed to claim against income for the following year, (but it never seemed useful to make a claim that following year or any of the last subsequent years due to little income). The overcontribution fell within the 2000 overcontribution allowance, and it was made at least 6 years ago and lumped together with all rsp contribution/investments.

I think the idea (and certainly the greater tax reduction) is to claim RSP contributions against employment income, but I think one can still claim contributions if you are within your deduction limit just to get the tax free compounding benefit, (which is what got me into rsp contributions since I was 20 yrs old with continuinng part time income and no immediate tax reduction benefit).

It seems the rsp wizard shows that claiming 1300 has no effect on 2014 tax owing but claiming 1500 does reduce it by a big $3. (there was an odd day of work income last year).

I wonder if using the overcontribution up now is the save time effective way to deal with the overcontribution , pay the rsp redemption income tax in the future vs filing the appropriate form for withdrawal of the overcontribution with no withholding tax now or within the future?
Income not expected to be higher in the future, but wonder if tax rates will increase for investment /rsp income in the future.

I'm not sure I understand the exact situation. Are you sure you still have an RRSP overcontribution, Yuj?

You may have overcontributed $1,500 at the time of contribution. But, if you have since earned an additional $8,000 of RRSP contribution room, then that $1,500 is no longer $1,500 of overcontribution. Instead, it may now be just $1,500 of unused RRSP contributions.

RRSP contributions are entered as a deduction on line 208. The deduction can be applied against any income, including interest, taxable dividends, and taxable capital gains. Confirm that when you use the RRSP wizard, that the $1,300 or $1,500 appears on line 208. A $1,300 deduction should reduce one's taxes by at least $300.

April 16, 2015
9:49 pm
yuj
Ontario
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 33
Member Since:
March 2, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

well I've done a good job of confusing everyone including myself.
I used to understand the rsp scheme, and thought I knew the situation, but as I have resorted to simply input numbers into tax software in recent yrs and not thought anymore about rsp's in years
I've discovered a current lapse of comprehension. Is this aging?

as reported on notice of assessment
rrsp deduction limit for 2014 $8000 (A)
have $1500 (B) of unused RRSP contribution available for 2014

April 17, 2015
6:01 am
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9235
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

OK. Let's start again, then.

Does this mean that you have, in the past, contributed $8000 which you have not yet claimed as a deduction?

And you're wondering if you should claim any of it against 2014 income?

April 17, 2015
6:40 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6748
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

yuj said
...
I used to understand the rsp scheme, and thought I knew the situation, but as I have resorted to simply input numbers into tax software in recent yrs and not thought anymore about rsp's in years
I've discovered a current lapse of comprehension. Is this aging?

It is probably a symptom of inputting the numbers into the tax software and not doing the calculations oneself!

as reported on notice of assessment
rrsp deduction limit for 2014 $8000 (A)
have $1500 (B) of unused RRSP contribution available for 2014

For 2014, your RRSP deduction limit of $8,000 (A) is greater than the $1,500 (B) of past RRSP contributions made, but unused (undeducted). With A > B, you don't have any overcontribution.

You just have $1,500 of past RRSP contributions that have not been deducted and that can be deducted in 2014 or in a future taxation year.

April 17, 2015
7:16 am
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3911
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

If you are looking at your 2013 Notice of Assessment, it's telling you what Norman1 is saying. The only thing I would add is that if you made more contributions after the first 2 months of 2014, they would not be reflected in the $1500 so you could also deduct them, up to your total $8K limit. Schedule 7 is a handy little thing, along with your NOAs, to keep your RRSP situation straight.

Lapse of comprehension is an age thing (my bias), as I do notice younger folks tend to prefer to input into The Machine instead of understanding the process. My adult kids want my help with their taxes so they have to sit around my dining room table with the paper forms and I supervise. It's funny, most of them will never vote Liberal again only because every year things are going along fine and then McGuinty's "temporary" Health Care Premium comes along at the very last line to scoop another $750, and by now every year they know it's coming and the cursing starts. Hilarious! But I do notice I seem to be "supervising" a growing circle of their friends who take advantage of my help instead of paying to have their tax returns done and it's interesting to see how they get so engaged when I answer their questions about this line or that surtax or that credit..........they get much more interested in politics all of a sudden, so I suspect the powers-that-be are quite happy to encourage (eventually mandate?) that folks just keep feeding electronic templates.

April 17, 2015
8:59 am
yuj
Ontario
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 33
Member Since:
March 2, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thanks all for helping me understand again what I once understood and answering some of my questions.
So in this case the wizard shows
no tax effect in claiming the unused 1500,
no tax effect in claiming the unused 1500 and an additional contribution of ~1450
$3 less tax if claiming the unused 1500 and an additional contribution of nearly ~1500
and greater reductions up to additional contribution ~6500.

I don't think it makes sense to put more into rsp at this stage in life ? and
am I right that I would have had to contribute before Mar 1,2014 ?

If I never find much reduction of tax to deduct the unused contributed 1500 (ie if every year is similar to this year) is it better to soon file the form T746 to withdraw the unused amount untaxed ?

by the way I know who OP refers to but what does 'OP' stand for?

April 17, 2015
8:11 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6748
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

yuj said
...
So in this case the wizard shows
no tax effect in claiming the unused 1500,
no tax effect in claiming the unused 1500 and an additional contribution of ~1450
$3 less tax if claiming the unused 1500 and an additional contribution of nearly ~1500
and greater reductions up to additional contribution ~6500.
....

That does not sound right.

Deducting the unused $1,500 of RRSP contributions should reduce taxable income (line 260) by $1,500. There should be a drop of federal taxes payable of at least $1,500 x 15% = $225.

Similarly, deducting the unused $1,500 and an additional contribution of ~$1,450 should reduce taxable income by $2,950. There should be a drop of federal taxes payable of at least $2,950 x 15% = $442.50.

There should also be a drop in provincial taxes payable.

Is taxable income on line 260 dropping by the appropriate amount when the RRSP contributions are claimed?

April 18, 2015
6:33 am
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3911
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

To add to Norman1: Line 208 of the return is the line that has to have the amount you want to deduct. Note that line 208 comes from line 16 of Schedule 7, so maybe the software requires that Schedule 7 be done for it to accept an amount on line 208 - ? CRA makes you go through the Sch 7 calculation, using amounts (A) and (B) from your 2013 NOA plus any additional amounts contributed between Mar 4 2014 - Mar 2 2015, in order to enter the correct line 208 amount and to calculate any remaining carry forward amounts.

April 18, 2015
7:11 am
yuj
Ontario
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 33
Member Since:
March 2, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

actually there is no federal tax payable, just Ont tax (or health tax?)
yes it does reduce net income,
but seems at some threshold
after applying a certain amount of rsp contribution it starts to reduce the ont tax by about 6%,

I've changed things around adding previous years losses etc,

April 18, 2015
11:58 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6748
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

6% is one of the possible marginal rates for the Ontario health premium. It sounds like you only have the Ontario health premium payable and no federal taxes on income and no Ontario taxes on income payable.

Check your Ontario Form ON428 (Ontario Tax). Without using your unused RRSP contributions, is your total Ontario taxes (line 74) the same as the Ontario Health Premium (line 73)?

If yes, then 2014 is not the best year to claim your unused RRSP contributions. If the same is still true without claiming previous years capital losses, then 2014 is not the best year to claim them as well.

May 2, 2015
8:34 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6748
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

There's no hurry to deduct one's unused (undeducted) RRSP contributions.

They don't expire and can be deducted in future years, even after one has turned 71 and had transferred the RRSP's to RRIF's or annuities.

One strategy is to contribute, to use up any remaining RRSP contribution room, before transferring one's RRSP's to RRIF's. The contribution can then be deducted over future years. This is from Manulife Financial article Reducing taxes in retirement:

Another strategy aimed at increasing deductions applies if you are turning age 71:

  • Make a lump sum final contribution to your RRSP, if you have unused room, before converting it to a RRIF. The resulting deduction does not have to be used in that year’s tax return but instead can be used at any time in the future – whenever it is most beneficial in reducing taxable earnings in retirement.

Please write your comments in the forum.