RBC customer's cheque was cashed ... not just once, but Twice ! | Page 2 | General financial discussion | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
RBC customer's cheque was cashed ... not just once, but Twice !
May 18, 2024
1:48 am
RetirEd
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1142
Member Since:
November 18, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Let's keep in mind that, despite saying a statement would "be considered correct" after 30 days (whatever that means), the banks assert their own ability to make changes for an arbitrarily long time afterward.

Frankly, I have always thought that mobile cheque deposit without follow-up depositing the physical cheque was an inexcusably stupid idea. At first, they DID require that, as I recall.

There's no way I would ever destroy my physical record of a transaction, including my duplicate-cheque chequebook. That alone would stop me from ever using mobile deposit. (Not to mention my refusal to do any online banking.)

RetirEd

May 18, 2024
4:27 am
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 958
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

RetirEd said
Let's keep in mind that, despite saying a statement would "be considered correct" after 30 days (whatever that means), the banks assert their own ability to make changes for an arbitrarily long time afterward.

Frankly, I have always thought that mobile cheque deposit without follow-up depositing the physical cheque was an inexcusably stupid idea. At first, they DID require that, as I recall.

There's no way I would ever destroy my physical record of a transaction, including my duplicate-cheque chequebook. That alone would stop me from ever using mobile deposit. (Not to mention my refusal to do any online banking.)  

Avoiding use of mobile deposits would do nothing to reduce your risk of falling foul to the incident described by the OP. Would just make you walk to the bank for no good reason.

You could protect yourself very effectively and without any detrimental effort by not using cheques (unless its to yourself). But that would mean having to use Interac etransfer and other online banking functions.

And checking transactions takes 5 seconds with a banking app. You could also get automatic notifications for each transaction.

In this particular case using online banking mitigates your risk and “traditional banking” creates the risk in the first place. Mobile cheque deposit capability isn’t the problem. Cheques could always be copied, or falsified and its rather easy to do.

May 18, 2024
6:57 am
Alexandre
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1228
Member Since:
November 8, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

AltaRed said

FWIW, out of curiosity, what do you do with the physical cheque once you have deposited a cheque using mobile app photo?

In a rare case when I have to deposit an actual cheque, and I always use app for that, I am getting email from my FI outlining how long should I keep original cheque. I think it is 30 days. I just put cheque aside for that period.
My FI also sends reminder email after that period, telling me it is now OK to dispose cheque. This is when cheque goes to shredder.

If someone cashes my cheque twice I am of a strong opinion that responsibility to prevent this lays on FI and FI only.
Never happened to me, but if it does - I'll contact my FI from which account cheque was drawn, notify them someone tried to deposit it second time and expect them to undo the transaction.

May 18, 2024
6:57 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3104
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

All my bank accounts have alerts (email and SMS text) to advise me whenever a withdrawal above $X* has been made and I know what withdrawals to expect at various times each month. Anything unexpected would get my attention to go into my account online and investigate. There is no reason to miss a nefarious withdrawal.

* Set it as low as one likes such as $15, or maybe $92 to mitigate number of alerts. Do the same for one's credit cards.

May 18, 2024
7:00 am
Alexandre
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1228
Member Since:
November 8, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

AltaRed said
All my bank accounts have alerts (email and SMS text) to advise me whenever a withdrawal above $X* has been made and I know what withdrawals to expect at various times each month. Anything unexpected would get my attention to go into my account online and investigate. There is no reason to miss a nefarious withdrawal.

* Set it as low as one likes such as $15, or maybe $92 to mitigate number of alerts. Do the same for one's credit cards.  

Excellent recommendation.

Mine is set to $0 or $1 or minimum FI allows, for both deposits and withdrawals. I don't mind number of alerts.

May 18, 2024
8:34 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7111
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

smayer97 said
"...you usually have 30 days after the date..."

People need to learn how to interpret the language. First, this is NOT law... Second, this is a guideline, as the emphasized word points out. Even "...this could differ from one bank to another." is about policy, not law.

The law allows up to 2 years before the statute of limitations applies.  

It is not a guideline. The limit is part of the account agreement. The exact time period does vary from bank to bank.

The RBC Royal Bank Personal Account Agreement allows 45 days after the end of the account's monthly cycle to report errors, like a duplicated cheque:

15. Account Verification and Security of Your Account
We are not responsible for monitoring your account on your behalf. It is your responsibility to regularly examine all Account transaction information in your Statements or other transaction records, including but not limited to Digital Banking records, ATM statements or any other transaction confirmations. You must notify us in writing of any errors, irregularities, omissions, unauthorized transactions, or forgeries related to or in the Account transaction information within 45 days of the last calendar date of your Monthly Cycle. If you do not notify us as required, you are deemed to have knowledge of and agreed to the Account transaction information, fees, and Instruments posted to your Account, and account balances, and will have accepted the Account transaction information and Statements as complete, correct and binding on you, and we will be released from all claims by you in respect of the Account transaction information and Statements or other transaction records, including any transaction and balance errors, and including any claim for negligence, conversion, breach of trust, breach of fiduciary duty or breach of contract.

The statute of limitations is moot afterwards. It just requires one to file the losing lawsuit against the bank in court within two years.

May 18, 2024
8:57 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3104
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

People need to read and understand the Ts and Cs of the agreement they make with their bank when they open their account. That is what each party will be held too in the event of a dispute.

May 18, 2024
9:01 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7111
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Alexandre said

In a rare case when I have to deposit an actual cheque, and I always use app for that, I am getting email from my FI outlining how long should I keep original cheque. I think it is 30 days. I just put cheque aside for that period.
My FI also sends reminder email after that period, telling me it is now OK to dispose cheque. This is when cheque goes to shredder.

The retention time can vary from bank to bank. Payments Canada Rule A10 (Imaging Rule), section 16 requires the original cheque to be destroyed no later than 120 days after the cheque is imaged.

Bank of Montreal requires personal banking clients destroy the mobile deposited cheque after 14 days:

What should I do with the cheque after I’ve deposited it?
Write the date and "Deposited" on the front of the cheque. Keep it for 14 days to ensure it clears, then destroy the cheque promptly after the 14-day period and no later than 120 calendar days after the deposit date.

Simplii Financial requires destruction after five days:

Mobile Deposit Service

Destruction and replacement of transmitted items

You agree to retain the item for at least 5 calendar days from the date of deposit and destroy it within 120 calendar days of deposit by shredding, pulping, burning, crushing, erasing or any other means that ensures that the item cannot be reused.

May 18, 2024
9:17 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3104
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

RBC is even more strict. After 5 days, it must be destroyed in a secure manner.

a) Technology Requirements. To use Mobile Cheque Deposit, you must obtain and maintain, at your own expense, a compatible Electronic Access Device, hardware, operating systems and software approved for such use by us, and which have not been altered from manufacturer specifications. You must also download the version of RBC Mobile that supports Mobile Cheque Deposit to your Electronic Access Device. We are not responsible for hardware, operating systems and software needed to operate Mobile Cheque Deposit. We have the right, in our sole discretion and without notice, to make changes to Mobile Cheque Deposit from time to time which may result in your Electronic Access Device, hardware, operating systems and software no longer being compatible with Mobile Cheque Deposit, and in such event, we will have no responsibility or liability to you or any other person.

b) Image Specifications. You will ensure all Images comply with applicable laws, including CPA Rules, and our specifications and quality standards. Images must be usable which means clearly represented, be able to be read or deciphered by a human viewer, and must be able to be seen without obstruction. The Image must accurately represent all relevant information on the front and back of the original paper Instrument. All information in each field or portion that is required to be present and read or deciphered by a human viewer on the Instrument must be present and be able to be read and deciphered by a human viewer in the Image. Any field or portion that would be required to be present and seen without obstruction on the Instrument, must be present and seen without obstruction in the Image. In the event an Image cannot be processed due to poor quality or otherwise, we are not responsible or liable for any failure or delay in the processing or presentment of the Image.

c) Safe Storage and Destruction; Image Retention. You will ensure that all original paper Instruments are securely stored for five (5) days after the date of Image creation, and then immediately destroyed using secure methods. You are solely responsible and liable for any losses or damages suffered or incurred by you or any person as a result of a lack of adequate security or controls over Instruments. We are not responsible or liable if an original paper Instrument is needed after it has been destroyed. You may request copies of any Images retained by us, for which there may be an additional fee. Upon request by us for any purpose, including for the purpose of an investigation involving the Instrument, you agree to promptly provide us with the original paper Instrument if it is still in your possession or your own copies or image of the Instrument.

Full conditions provided here https://www.rbcroyalbank.com/onlinebanking/bankingusertips/agreement/eaa/2015/partG_mobileTC.html

May 18, 2024
9:27 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7111
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Alexandre said
If someone cashes my cheque twice I am of a strong opinion that responsibility to prevent this lays on FI and FI only.
Never happened to me, but if it does - I'll contact my FI from which account cheque was drawn, notify them someone tried to deposit it second time and expect them to undo the transaction.

It is a shared responsibility.

The drawee bank will catch the second deposit attempt if a cheque is deposited again shortly after the first deposit. But, the bank will not compare each cheque against all the cheques previously cleared against the account for the past seven years.

This is also not a new problem. CBC Go Public story When banks cash your same cheque twice, you may be on the hook to pay is from April 2018.

Banks have 90 days after receiving a duplicate-deposited cheque to bounce it back. Account holders who let their bank know within the 30 days, 45 days, or 60 days allowed by their account agreement are not going to be out any money.

May 18, 2024
11:31 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9376
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Banks do and will set the rules to work in their favour as much as they can get away with it. Thus they will try in as many ways as possible to claim that it's the customer's fault if the bank cashes a cheque more than once.

While it's not unreasonable to expect people to check their statements, many of these statements are frequently hard to understand. AltaRed says it takes five minutes to go over a statement. It takes me about 30 to 60 minutes for my main bank account statement at a Big Bank. This is partly because I have a vision disability, but that's not the only reason.

I want banks and CUs to be more conscientious and responsible in the info provided on those statements. One of them, I believe it's Tangerine, doesn't even tell you if an amount is a deposit or a withdrawal. Most of them lack full info about where a deposit came from or where a transfer went. Copies of cancelled cheques are now often unavailable whereas they used to be included. The biggest chunk of time I spend reviewing a statement is devoted to figuring out what the transactions refers to.
If they want us to be responsible for overseeing their system, they have to make the statements more intelligible. I would imagine that this is a major reason why a lot of people don't bother. (Same goes for the receipts that many ATMs spit out.)
I would also like to see a requirement for a consistent format for statements.

And, yes, since someone is bound to ask, I do keep my own record of transactions to which to refer, but that doesn't verify that this is where the money went or came from. The statement can and should show all relevant details and be easy to read. That's the FI's responsibility.

May 19, 2024
3:39 am
RetirEd
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1142
Member Since:
November 18, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I balance my statements with my own spreadsheets, duplicates and slips monthly, but also update things every two or three days, verifying by touch-tone banking.

RetirEd

May 19, 2024
7:01 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3104
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I can only speak for our dealings with Scotiabank bank statements. Except for Interac e-transfers which are non-descriptive other than deposit or withdrawal, I find the description of other transactions quite intelligible. Cheques have the cheque number provided, and if looking online, each cheque has a link to an online image of the cheque if one clicks through.

We have in the order of 7-12 line entries for each of 2 chequing accounts each month so in our case, it literally is about a 1 minute check for each statement.

Other FIs may do more poorly (or better) with their line entries. The more important item is, as per Alexandre, to have Alerts set so that ANY withdrawal or deposited provides an Alert in real time.... in our case, seconds or minutes for example of the actual transaction being booked. Looking at the monthly statement then becomes almost a redundant activity.

May 19, 2024
10:49 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7111
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Cheque images are not needed to detect double presentment of cheques. Cancelled cheques or their images were not always free. I've never paid extra for either.

Chequing account statements show the cheque number and amount. That's enough to verify with entries in a cheque register, either a paper one or a software one, like in Quicken. As they appear on the statements, the cheques are marked as cleared in the register.

That will detect multiple presentments of cheques, even years later, as well as any tampering with the amount of the cheque.

Challenge is that some people don't keep track of the cheques they write and whether or not each cheque has cleared yet. Without doing that, one can't be sure a cheque showing up is legitmate or not. Based on the December date the cheque cleared, the victim in the CBC story initially thought that $150 cheque was to the snow removal company!

The story also raises an odd detail. The cheque was presented initially in July 2022 and again in December 2023. The cheque would have been over 17 months old when presented the second time in December 2023. Why wasn't the cheque rejected by the second mobile deposit attempt?

Simplii's account agreement, for example, prohibits the mobile deposit of stale-dated items:

Eligible items

• You may image and deposit any of these original Canadian currency paper items issued by a financial institution located in Canada: cheques, bank money orders, bank drafts, convenience cheques and certified cheques.

• You agree you will not image and deposit any of the following:

  • Items which are postdated or dated more than 6 months prior to the date of deposit.

EQ Bank's account agreement also disallows stale-dated cheques, both by mail and mobile deposit:

4. Cheque Parameters and Eligible Items

You agree to the following whenever you deposit a cheque:

  • Only paper cheques that are made payable solely to you can be deposited. Items payable jointly or payable to someone else and endorsed to you will not be accepted;
  • Each cheque must be in the standard format approved by Payments Canada. The date, drawee institution, payee, amount in words and figures, signature of the payor and magnetic ink character recognition information must be clearly legible;
  • Each image captured through Mobile Cheque Deposit must be a picture of the original paper cheque, front and back, and not of a photocopy, PDF or printout;
  • Cheques must not be post-dated or dated more than 6 months prior to the date of deposit;
May 19, 2024
9:46 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9376
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Norman1 said
Cheque images are not needed to detect double presentment of cheques. Cancelled cheques or their images were not always free. I've never paid extra for either.

Chequing account statements show the cheque number and amount. That's enough to verify with entries in a cheque register, either a paper one or a software one, like in Quicken. As they appear on the statements, the cheques are marked as cleared in the register.

That will detect multiple presentments of cheques, even years later, as well as any tampering with the amount of the cheque.

Identifying that a withdrawal was legitimate and that it corresponds to your own records is not be sufficient, however, to prove that the money really did go to X person or business. Only the image of a draft or cancelled cheque can do that.
Considering the growing concerns about money laundering, and the ever-increasing watch-dog tracking of our accounts, these images may one day be our only defence for legitimate transactions or to prove we paid a bill, especially where large numbers are concerned. In theory, you can probably somehow retrieve this information from the bank (although could be quite difficult after a few years), but you can be sure they will find a way to charge you a fee for digging it out.
Thus, I consider them extremely important.

@ AltaRed:
I don't deal with Scotia, but one of my Big Bank accounts also does print the face of the cheque with the statement, but they reduce it by about 75% so that it is extremely difficult to read; I'm not sure it would meet any standard of proof.

May 21, 2024
10:23 am
smayer97
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 884
Member Since:
September 29, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

So many things people are overlooking, all to blame the victim.

Banks no longer check to whom the money goes, the date on cheques, and clearly check for duplicate deposits. So much fraud is possible if intended, some as noted.

Also note that if you rely on notifications from RBC, about 6+ months ago, they removed the descriptor from the email notification to tell you by whom a withdrawal or deposit is for. So, the only way to know who, is to log into your bank account... To me this is a huge security flaw.

So, as the article points out, there was confusion as to whom the withdraw when. Have you never written a cheque for the same amount, to different people, or even the same person more than once? How easy is it really to spot a duplicate cheque, unless you keep excellent and timely records, not only of amounts, but person, and cheque number? Who would anticipate the re-deposit of the same cheque? As many here, you would assume that the bank has some security to check that basic info... clearly they do not. Checking for duplicate cheque numbers would be such a simple thing to implement.

And life circumstances can be very difficult for some that prevent them from staying on top of the finances to that level all the time. Some of you here clearly have never gone through hardships to that level. Some here need to develop some compassion.

But blaming the victim is rarely the answer, especially when the bank takes away easy mechanisms that used to be in place to aid in this process, and has been clearly shown, even fail to implement some basics measures. They provide the tools yet take little responsibility? Hmmmm.

Anyway, I've said enough on this topic. Some really need to get out more, and know that life is not always as simple as you want it to be. I do not wish that you should ever experience serious hardships to help you understand.

May 23, 2024
7:54 am
RetirEd
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1142
Member Since:
November 18, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I seem to recall that, a few years ago, there was news about contractors depositing cheques more than once despite using the "barred" cheque marking. And something else involving them being re-deposited after being replaced after being "lost" - I can't find the items. Anyone else?

RetirEd

May 24, 2024
8:11 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7111
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I found CTV (August 30, 2019): Calgary man lost hundreds from double-deposited cheque:

A Calgary man lost nearly $700 after a cheque he wrote was cashed twice, once through a mobile banking app, and the second time after being signed over to someone else.

Nathan Chan wrote the cheque for $678.75 in March 2018 to a contractor.

He thought everything was fine until he recently noticed it was deposited twice; once when he handed it over and a second time four months later.

Cheques are bills of exchange and not general legal contracts. Bills of Exchange Act section 16 require bills of exchange to be unconditional orders. So, one can't add arbitrary conditions to cheques, like "Not valid after 30 days" or "Not valid until 14 days after deck work is completed."

May 24, 2024
8:38 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7111
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

smayer97 said

So, as the article points out, there was confusion as to whom the withdraw when. Have you never written a cheque for the same amount, to different people, or even the same person more than once? How easy is it really to spot a duplicate cheque, unless you keep excellent and timely records, not only of amounts, but person, and cheque number? Who would anticipate the re-deposit of the same cheque? As many here, you would assume that the bank has some security to check that basic info... clearly they do not. Checking for duplicate cheque numbers would be such a simple thing to implement.

Serial numbers on cheques are optional and are intended to help people keep track of their issued cheques. The serial numbers have no legal significance.

Some of my cheques have the same serial numbers because of an ordering screwup by bank staff. The cheques are perfectly valid.

Records of issued cheques have always been needed to figure out how much money one has available in the chequing account and to detect tampered cheques. Duplicate cheques are caught as well by the same recordkeeping.

So what if victims are being blamed. Victims are the blame if they are neglient in handling their funds or their affairs. Bank has done nothing wrong when people don't even check at their monthly statements to see if there is anything wrong!

May 24, 2024
8:56 am
Dean
Valhalla Mountains, British Columbia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2105
Member Since:
January 12, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Norman1 said

. . .

So what if victims are being blamed. Victims are the blame if they are neglient in handling their funds or their affairs. Bank has done nothing wrong when people don't even check at their monthly statements to see if there is anything wrong! 
 

. . . 'Amen' to That ⬆ ❗

    Dean

sf-cool " Live Long, Healthy ... And Prosper! " sf-cool

No permission to create posts

Please write your comments in the forum.