Newbie Question | General financial discussion | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Newbie Question
December 7, 2017
6:22 am
cpm
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
December 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hello everyone. About two weeks ago I began to study investing, with an intention to slowly begin the process and eventually make my first purchase.

I've been looking on mutual fund sites for high performing funds, and there are plenty to choose from. I see funds with upwards of 40% returns over the past year.

With so many options of funds performing at that level, it seems like it should be relatively easy to achieve at least 10% return on investment. But I know that's not true. Could people share insights on why it ISN'T true?

As a newbie, I'm feeling inspired and highly optimistic, but I know this is a naive phase. So I want to figure out how to proceed and avoid careless mistakes.

December 7, 2017
10:27 am
tcharger67
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 104
Member Since:
September 22, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Read, Read, Read. Than diversify, and cover your tax loses
Personally I'm and Index fund. A good book to read, is how a 5th grader beat wall street.
I stick to TD e-series, and CIBC's Index funds. The lower MER's outweigh the little extra trimming from high MER funds
Personally, I was invest in TDB900, TDB902 just to name a couple this year. That being said, everything is sitting in cash low interest savings accounts right now.
The markets are now in the second longest bull run in the history of the market, and with so much instability. In august 2018 it will be the longest run ever. In my opinion, the markets have always stayed in cycles, and to think the small potential gain in the near future will outweigh the guaranteed loses, or the idea that you'll jump out at the right moment, is in my opinion just ludicrous.

I'm not giving advice, just voicing my personal aptitude. This being the position of a 32 year old, whom was read the wealthy barber as a young child, with over 342,000$ in savings.

Remember the rule of 72
Ken

December 7, 2017
10:29 am
rhvic
Victoria, BC
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 469
Member Since:
May 28, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I'm not sure this is the forum to answer your question. Here we are concerned about interest rates on savings accounts and perhaps GICs. For mutual funds and investments such as stocks, bonds, etc., perhaps someone else could suggest a more relevant discussion forum.

December 7, 2017
11:05 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2893
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online

I would recommend the OP spend some time with http://www.finiki.org which is authored and supported by the Financial Wisdom Forum. There is much to learn before investing in stocks, bonds, mutual funds, ETFs, etc. but a Couch Potato indexing approach likely works best for the majority of retail investors.

December 7, 2017
1:35 pm
Nicklen
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
June 24, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I recommend http://www.canadianmoneyforum.com if you want to ask investing questions, no guarantees on the answers though 🙂

December 7, 2017
1:55 pm
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2893
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online

There is a certain noise to signal ratio on any free and anonymous financial discussion forum. Information can also be wrong albeit it is often challenged by knowledgeable others. I have my own bias on preference but each has to find the one that suits them best and to spend appropriate time getting to know the participants.

December 7, 2017
4:04 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9255
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Since this is a general discussion sub-forum, I think your questions are not inappropriate. For more detail, you might do better at other forums, but right now you are asking some basic questions. Also, since most people on this forum are on the more conservative end of investing, you are more likely to get cautious advice and get into less trouble!.

The fundamental question that you have asked is about the discrepancy between the apparent ability to draw much larger returns than the ones that are likely to in fact come. You are wisely second-guessing your own optimism. Take your time. Don't jump in.

You can read about this in any number of books. If you haven't read the newer version of Wealthy Barber, it's not a bad place to start.

Some things that I think are important:
1. What has happened in the past has little to do with what will happen in the future. Thus, last year's 40% is likely to be this year's 1% or might even come in at a loss. Higher rewards are typically balanced by higher risk and tend to be more volatile. Next year's winner was probably last year's laggard.
2. Markets are not predictable, period. Repeat, not predictable. But lots of people make lots of money forecasting, promising, advising, packaging, directing, and, perhaps most importantly, selling, so there will always be lots of recommendations and pseudo-promises and choices. They will always be overwhelming, and, if you pay attention to them, you will never be sure of what to do. It is meant to be overwhelming, because lots of people want a slice of (your) pie. The more confusing it is, the more likely you are to be willing to pay them, and they will get paid whether you win or lose. It's always set up that way.
3. Unless you are one in a million, you will never know enough to regularly outsmart the markets. If the average that people are getting is, say 6%, it's extremely unlikely you will do better on a consistent basis. And it would take so much time and effort (or luck) to do so that it wouldn't be worth it.
4. Most people who have stars in their eyes about spectacular profits made by someone else in some other year are going to be in for a hard landing.

Those are the realities as I see them.

Now, once you've absorbed those realities, you will perhaps see that it is not necessarily going to be easy to get 10% (or any other specific figure for that matter). What you can hope for is to do at least as well as most other thoughtful prudent investors, and to get reasonably consistent results over time. Even so, there will be bad years and good ones.

If you don't follow the prudent route, you can expect some terrible years and some good ones, and perhaps even some spectacular ones once in a while. And, if you're like most of us, you can expect to have a number of sleepless nights. In the end,you will not likely be any further ahead, you might be down, and worst of all, you might be down at a time when you need the money. If you do a really bad job, you might lose it all.

If you are itching to chase that 40% stock or fund or the one that is promised for next year, whatever it may be, put "play money" into your budget, with the understanding that you could lose it. Keep it separate from your other investments. When it's gone, it's gone, until you decide to devote some of the another year's budget to it. Consider it like buying lottery tickets or going to bingo.

For the serious stuff, you will, sooner or later, probably realize that what works best is:
1. Have a long horizon. You are only 32, so you have lots of time.
2. Choose a few good funds and put equal amounts into them. The list at Couch Potato is as good as any. Don't spend a lot of time splitting hairs between various funds. Less is more.
3. Make sure you are not choosing 2 funds that basically carry the same stocks or bonds.
4. Choose one fund for each category of investment. This is diversification. Couch potato can guide you with this. They have already figured it out and you really don't need to spend time trying to do a better job.
5. Every so often, to maximize your profits, rebalance your portfolio. In other words, if you started with 10K invested in each of five funds, then, after a year, one might be at 8K and another at 12K, etc. You want to bring them back to even amounts. This means profit taking on the ones that have done well and reinvesting that in the ones that will profit in t future. Advice on how often to rebalance varies from 3 months to 1 year, but the important thing is to do it and not just let them sit there
indefinitely. Keep an eye on them. This allows you to take profits and increase your profits. Wait for any outstanding dividends to come in before you do it. You can rebalance and avoid selling fees by simply adding more to the underdogs.

I should perhaps say that I haven't done this myself, but I've read enough to be convinced that this is the way to go. I don't feel my horizon is long enough to make this significantly worthwhile, it's too much bother and worry for me, and I have no need of or interest in market risk.

December 7, 2017
4:52 pm
cpm
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
December 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

tcharger67 said
Read, Read, Read. Than diversify, and cover your tax loses
Personally I'm and Index fund. A good book to read, is how a 5th grader beat wall street.
I stick to TD e-series, and CIBC's Index funds. The lower MER's outweigh the little extra trimming from high MER funds
Personally, I was invest in TDB900, TDB902 just to name a couple this year. That being said, everything is sitting in cash low interest savings accounts right now.
The markets are now in the second longest bull run in the history of the market, and with so much instability. In august 2018 it will be the longest run ever. In my opinion, the markets have always stayed in cycles, and to think the small potential gain in the near future will outweigh the guaranteed loses, or the idea that you'll jump out at the right moment, is in my opinion just ludicrous.

I'm not giving advice, just voicing my personal aptitude. This being the position of a 32 year old, whom was read the wealthy barber as a young child, with over 342,000$ in savings.

Remember the rule of 72
Ken  

Thanks for this Ken. The tip that we're in the longest bull run ever is good to know. Gives me cause to rethink if I'm even going to invest at this particular moment. But read read read is what I've been doing, so onward I will go with that strategy for now.

December 7, 2017
4:53 pm
cpm
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
December 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

AltaRed said
I would recommend the OP spend some time with http://www.finiki.org which is authored and supported by the Financial Wisdom Forum. There is much to learn before investing in stocks, bonds, mutual funds, ETFs, etc. but a Couch Potato indexing approach likely works best for the majority of retail investors.  

Thanks for the leads AltaRed. And I like the suggestion of index investing, just starting to read about that now.

December 7, 2017
4:58 pm
cpm
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
December 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Loonie said
Since this is a general discussion sub-forum, I think your questions are not inappropriate. For more detail, you might do better at other forums, but right now you are asking some basic questions. Also, since most people on this forum are on the more conservative end of investing, you are more likely to get cautious advice and get into less trouble!.

The fundamental question that you have asked is about the discrepancy between the apparent ability to draw much larger returns than the ones that are likely to in fact come. You are wisely second-guessing your own optimism. Take your time. Don't jump in.

You can read about this in any number of books. If you haven't read the newer version of Wealthy Barber, it's not a bad place to start.

Some things that I think are important:
1. What has happened in the past has little to do with what will happen in the future. Thus, last year's 40% is likely to be this year's 1% or might even come in at a loss. Higher rewards are typically balanced by higher risk and tend to be more volatile. Next year's winner was probably last year's laggard.
2. Markets are not predictable, period. Repeat, not predictable. But lots of people make lots of money forecasting, promising, advising, packaging, directing, and, perhaps most importantly, selling, so there will always be lots of recommendations and pseudo-promises and choices. They will always be overwhelming, and, if you pay attention to them, you will never be sure of what to do. It is meant to be overwhelming, because lots of people want a slice of (your) pie. The more confusing it is, the more likely you are to be willing to pay them, and they will get paid whether you win or lose. It's always set up that way.
3. Unless you are one in a million, you will never know enough to regularly outsmart the markets. If the average that people are getting is, say 6%, it's extremely unlikely you will do better on a consistent basis. And it would take so much time and effort (or luck) to do so that it wouldn't be worth it.
4. Most people who have stars in their eyes about spectacular profits made by someone else in some other year are going to be in for a hard landing.

Those are the realities as I see them.

Now, once you've absorbed those realities, you will perhaps see that it is not necessarily going to be easy to get 10% (or any other specific figure for that matter). What you can hope for is to do at least as well as most other thoughtful prudent investors, and to get reasonably consistent results over time. Even so, there will be bad years and good ones.

If you don't follow the prudent route, you can expect some terrible years and some good ones, and perhaps even some spectacular ones once in a while. And, if you're like most of us, you can expect to have a number of sleepless nights. In the end,you will not likely be any further ahead, you might be down, and worst of all, you might be down at a time when you need the money. If you do a really bad job, you might lose it all.

If you are itching to chase that 40% stock or fund or the one that is promised for next year, whatever it may be, put "play money" into your budget, with the understanding that you could lose it. Keep it separate from your other investments. When it's gone, it's gone, until you decide to devote some of the another year's budget to it. Consider it like buying lottery tickets or going to bingo.

For the serious stuff, you will, sooner or later, probably realize that what works best is:
1. Have a long horizon. You are only 32, so you have lots of time.
2. Choose a few good funds and put equal amounts into them. The list at Couch Potato is as good as any. Don't spend a lot of time splitting hairs between various funds. Less is more.
3. Make sure you are not choosing 2 funds that basically carry the same stocks or bonds.
4. Choose one fund for each category of investment. This is diversification. Couch potato can guide you with this. They have already figured it out and you really don't need to spend time trying to do a better job.
5. Every so often, to maximize your profits, rebalance your portfolio. In other words, if you started with 10K invested in each of five funds, then, after a year, one might be at 8K and another at 12K, etc. You want to bring them back to even amounts. This means profit taking on the ones that have done well and reinvesting that in the ones that will profit in t future. Advice on how often to rebalance varies from 3 months to 1 year, but the important thing is to do it and not just let them sit there
indefinitely. Keep an eye on them. This allows you to take profits and increase your profits. Wait for any outstanding dividends to come in before you do it. You can rebalance and avoid selling fees by simply adding more to the underdogs.

I should perhaps say that I haven't done this myself, but I've read enough to be convinced that this is the way to go. I don't feel my horizon is long enough to make this significantly worthwhile, it's too much bother and worry for me, and I have no need of or interest in market risk.  

Hey Loonie. I appreciate your response very much. It's the reality check I've been looking for, and lot's to contemplate. The more I read about investing, the more I realize that trying to "make money," by chasing any of these high yield funds or companies, is not a long term strategy that's going to pay off. So now, I need to figure out how to get started with a sound strategy. Index funds are looking like my style at this moment.

December 7, 2017
5:09 pm
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2893
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online

Don't chase last year's hot fund or stock. There is regression to the mean over time. It is much better to look at 3, 5, 10 year cumulative (or average annual) returns to get a sense of how that sector, geographic region, or asset type is expected to do.

Take a look at the variance of just stocks (by type/region) here
http://www.ndir.com/cgi-bin/Pe.....eturns.cgi

Look at multi-year asset type returns in Norm Rothery's Asset Mixer and play with ranges
http://www.ndir.com/cgi-bin/do.....de_adv.cgi

But that is all advanced stuff that isn't worth looking at until you understand the basics of investing at places like http://www.finiki.org

December 7, 2017
8:07 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6775
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

cpm said
I've been looking on mutual fund sites for high performing funds, and there are plenty to choose from. I see funds with upwards of 40% returns over the past year.

With so many options of funds performing at that level, it seems like it should be relatively easy to achieve at least 10% return on investment. But I know that's not true. Could people share insights on why it ISN'T true?
…

One cannot as easily see the future as one can the past. It is not as easy to find the funds that will return 40% after one has invested as it is to find the ones that had returned 40% before one had invested.

Re-sort the list with ascending rate of return instead of descending. That will show the more somber performance of the worst performers.

People can end up those funds in the bottom quartile in their portfolio as well as funds in the top quartile.

Also, that line of reasoning is flawed. The flaw is shown by changing your statement slightly:

I've been looking at salaries of people living in Toronto. I see many people there (executives of Canada's banks and publicly traded companies there) being paid over $1 million and even over $10 million the past year!

With so many people earning that kind of money, it seems like it should be relatively easy to earn at least $100,000 a year working in Toronto.

December 7, 2017
10:38 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9255
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Good one, Norman! sf-laugh

December 9, 2017
5:54 am
cpm
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
December 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Loonie said
Good one, Norman! sf-laugh  

Thanks for that Norman, puts things in perspective!

December 10, 2017
6:34 am
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3930
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Anyone know any good mutual funds or ETFs that pay out no income, i.e. are just for growth and capital gains, pay out minimal or no income (like stocks that pay no dividends)? Or how to find any? Took a cursory look and it seems this info is not readily out there, everybody wants to maximize income. I know this is not really the place but I'm hoping to sneak this one by to minimize my research time, someone might know off the top - I'd rather be outside when I see the beautiful white stuff out there this morning!

Please write your comments in the forum.