Money Market funds or in an ISA? | Page 3 | General financial discussion | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Money Market funds or in an ISA?
March 6, 2018
12:59 am
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9391
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

With registered funds, it's "gotcha" unless and until you're willing to move them out of there to another FI and take the hit on the transfer fee if you can't get it reimbursed.

Another thought on the .25%. It's my understanding that under the new rules, they have to disclose all fees. Maybe i'm wrong about this, but that's what I thought happened with changes last year.
That confusing array of numbers and series is functional for them.
By having two different rates for two supposedly different accounts, they avoid disclosing the fee. or at least until someone catches up with them.

March 6, 2018
6:09 am
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4022
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Marnie, I agree, with registered accounts you're by definition less mobile with your money.

As someone who actually invests in various vehicles, for all my investment accounts starting last year I've been quite pleased with the info disclosed. It's not been confusing at all to me, just takes a few minutes to read and digest. And I've confidence that RBC or TD, say, have disclosed as required, that they're not that dumb to think they would gain from or get away with not meeting their requirements.

March 6, 2018
8:52 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3128
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Under CRM2 requirements, http://business.financialpost......ting-rules there was a requirement starting with 2016 year end to show account performance and to disclose fees paid on behalf of the client to the FI, e.g. brokerage. Such fees include fund trailer fees, buy/sell commissions, and account fees.

There is no slight of hand. Wise investors already know that mutual funds, other than F series, already pay trailer fees to the financial advisor/broker. The one thing that is still broken is that there is no need to disclose Management Fees of the Manager of the mutual fund itself. That is where most of the cost is and what most investors do not yet understand. In a typical equity mutual fund, the management fee might be 2% or more....and the trailer fee might be 0.5-1.0%.

Some investors and financial planners made representations to the OSC/CSC a few years back arguing that management fees should be disclosed, and further that F series mutual funds should be obtainable via discount brokers. The argument being that the trailer fee is meant to compensate financial advisors for their guidance and advice to clients, but of course, discount brokerages do not provide any advice. They are simply order takers. Alas, nothing has come to pass. Canadians, relative to Brits and Americans for example, still get hosed. Hence wise investors have moved from high MER actively managed mutual funds to low MER passive index mutual funds, or extremely low MER Exchange Traded Funds traded on the equity markets.

Ultimately , the battle over access to F series ISA funds to get the extra 0.25% into investor hands will continue, perhaps well past my best before date. That said, like a few others have mentioned, I use the brokerage ISA funds as a placeholder for cash while I make buy/sell decisions on various stock and bond investments.

March 6, 2018
10:55 am
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4022
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

AltaRed, very true, Canadians are being hosed compared to USA. However before a wise investor purchases a mutual fund it's pretty easy to find what its MER is. Also, I believe most (all?) funds' annual returns are expressed after the MER is deducted, i.e. if a fund shows it earned 5% last year, that's after the MER has been charged.

March 6, 2018
11:06 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3128
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Bill said
However before a wise investor purchases a mutual fund it's pretty easy to find what its MER is. Also, I believe most (all?) funds' annual returns are expressed after the MER is deducted, i.e. if a fund shows it earned 5% last year, that's after the MER has been charged.  

Well, yes, MERs are published and returns are net of MER, but most investors don't realize how MERs work and how that is a headwind to performance returns. At one time before the advent of ETFs and discount brokerages, investors were mostly hostage to mutual fund sales folk and full service brokerages. Thank goodness that model is breaking down allowing those of us who want to DIY, to do so cost effectively and efficiently.

July 21, 2018
11:21 am
news70
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
February 19, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

As of today 07/21/18, I noticed that A serial of rbf1002 charges 0.60% however D serial charges 0.61% , isn't D serial supposed to be cheaper?
Series: A
Fund Code: RBF271
Load Structure: No Load
Currency: CAD
Inception Date: Nov, 1986
Series A Yield %: 1.0905
Series A MER %: 0.60

Series: D
Fund Code: RBF1002
Load Structure: No Load
Currency: CAD
Inception Date: Jul, 2007
Series D Yield %: 1.0893
Series D MER %: 0.61

July 21, 2018
2:43 pm
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3128
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

That is indeed bizarre. One would think it would be part way between Series A (full trailer fee of about 25bp) and Series F (zero trailer fee).

July 23, 2018
5:52 am
NorthernRaven
Moderator
Moderators
Forum Posts: 675
Member Since:
August 4, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

There's a minimal 1 basis point between the two, and the F series is only 5 basis points lower (0.56) - this isn't the full 25 basis point sort of fund. These aren't laws of physics - there's likely some quirk in how they come up with these that make it come out this way. A money market fund isn't exactly high-margin, or susceptible to fancy sales pitches that are worth a quarter point commission!

July 23, 2018
11:46 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3128
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I agree something is different here. I know the brokerage based ISAs (Investment Savings Accounts sold as mutual funds) typically have a distinct 25bp difference in MER between Series A and F. Clearly MMF trailer fees must vary between providers.

July 24, 2018
8:39 am
news70
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
February 19, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Reply from rbcdi:
"The MER for both RBF271 and RBF1002 is 0.61%. The Management fee for RBF271 is 0.75% and for RBF1002 it is 0.60%. Please note that these funds are offered by RBC Global Asset Management and not RBC Direct Investing so any questions you may have regarding the performance of the two funds, you will need to ask them directly. "
hmmm, if management fee is 75 bp how come MER ( net of management fee & other fees?) Is less... ?

Never mind, just find out that RBC ISA in CAD as of 07/12/18 is 1.35% now , CDIC insured and beats the money market version out of water ...

July 24, 2018
6:35 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7171
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

0.75% is probably the regular management fee. But, RBC Global Asset Management probably waived part of that to keep the return to the fund unitholders from going negative.

Can't be charging ¾% management fee when money market instruments, like Government of Canada treasury bills, were only paying around ½% during 2016 and part of 2017.

As a result, fund managers had been waiving portions of their management fees and suspending trailers on their money market funds. See Globe & Mail: Money market funds to trim fees.

I think the A, D, and F series don't have significantly different MER's because none of them had been paying trailers.

July 27, 2018
6:23 pm
sellis
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
September 19, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Are these products similar to Purpose investments PSA ETF? I have been using that and the PSU ETF for short term cash needs in CAD and USD.

July 30, 2018
9:12 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7171
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Yes, they are similar to those High Interest Savings ETF's offered by Purpose Investments.

They are so similar that bank-owned discount brokerages RBC Direct Investing and TD Direct Investing refuse orders for the High Interest Savings ETF (TSX stock symbol PSA)!

Rob Carrick wrote about the situation in the July 27 Globe & Mail article "Not all online brokers are friendly to investors holding cash".

May 4, 2023
4:55 pm
AndreyG
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 55
Member Since:
April 9, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It is 2023, May 4. how Money Market Funds are doing now?
I checked at TD - TDB2913 yield 4.73% today.
How they compare with ISA?

May 4, 2023
7:14 pm
Rail Baron
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 319
Member Since:
November 3, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

AndreyG said
It is 2023, May 4. how Money Market Funds are doing now?
I checked at TD - TDB2913 yield 4.73% today.
How they compare with ISA?  

See for yourself here:

https://www.rbcroyalbank.com/products/isa/index.html

May 4, 2023
7:33 pm
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3128
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Norman1 keeps a table updated regularly with all the main CAD ISAs in a thread focused on that. Check for yourself?

May 5, 2023
4:12 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7171
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
May 5, 2023
10:55 am
AndreyG
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 55
Member Since:
April 9, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Ok. In reference to TD, my home bank,
ISA TDB8150 interest 4.05%
Money market fund TDB2913 interest 4.73%.
It is quite a difference.
TDB8150 is CDIC - insured.
Are there any other reasons to buy ISA vs Money market Fund?

May 5, 2023
6:19 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7171
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The TDB2913 TD Canadian Money Market Fund is riskier.

According to its December 2022 annual report, over 85% of its assets had no government backing:

43.4% Commercial paper
38.4% Bankers' acceptances
3.6% Corporate bonds

The yield is being juiced by commercial paper.

May 5, 2023
7:11 pm
AndreyG
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 55
Member Since:
April 9, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hi Norman1,

thank you for your analysis - very useful.
Regards,
Andrey

No permission to create posts

Please write your comments in the forum.