Log In
Register
Home
Topic RSS
Facebook
Twitter
Email this8:31 am
December 12, 2009
Offline
In perhaps the most uninteresting and useless CDIC deposit protection change, or "enhancement," CDIC protection has, or will be, extended to eligible deposit products with RESPs and RDSPs. Protection will be similar to the protection with RRSPs and RRIFs.
However, unlike RRSPs and RRIFs, RESPs and RDSPs provide no refund of income taxes or tax deferral. In this way, they're more akin to TFSAs except that withdrawals from RESPs and RDSPs are not re-added to your next year's contribution room. and, of course, there's limitations (especially with RESPs) in how the funds may be spent. Also, with RESPs, if the beneficiary does not end up going to college, trade school, or university and the funds returned to the principal contributor/plan holder, there are income tax implications.
These are interesting points, to be sure, but none of which are why this is the most uninteresting and useless news...in saving for education, with a long-term time horizon and very young age of the beneficiary, you want maximum capital growth, in order to benefit from the tax-free growth and provide for having a chance of financing the beneficiary's education. Ultra secure CDIC protected deposits will not do that and, worse, will be used by financial institutions (particularly credit unions) that strive to maintain deposits they can't upsell to investment products by (mis)selling a CDIC RESP product that would be woefully inappropriate.
Cheers,
Doug
9:34 am
September 11, 2013
Offline
Lots of folks use RESPs not to completely fund the later education (that's what summer jobs, etc are for) but to maximize getting the available gov't grants and to set aside securely a bit of money that can be used for education. In my case the goal was not to maximize capital growth but to have a bit of a pile available to help out when the time came. Kids were happy when they found out there was some money there, it was a bonus, much of it paid for by my fellow citizens. So for many folks GICs, etc do the trick just fine.
12:34 pm
January 12, 2019
Offline
.
Unlike many of us here, some people (regardless of age) don't/won't invest in stocks & bonds, no matter the time frame involved, or the type of registered SP(s) they have. They are often referred to as; 'The Risk-Averse'.
These are the people who Only invest in SA's & GIC's, and it's these people
who will benefit the most from the CDIC coverages mentioned above,
and here ⬇
My two Centavos 
- Dean
" Live Long, Healthy ... And Prosper! "
3:32 pm
January 9, 2011
Offline
My reaction to this uninteresting and useless protection change was CDIC was under pressure to do something, either
(a) the obvious, which is increase the 100k maximums either by a monetary increase, or introduce annual indexing, but why do something people want and have been saying for years...
(b) or simply, do something meaningless to justify continuing their existence/salary.
The main accomplishment of almost all organized protests is to
annoy people who are not in them.
3:37 pm
April 14, 2021
Offline
Along with all those useless TV commercials during the darkest times of the pandemic saying, "CDIC is here to protect your deposits."
Translation: "We're still here and trying to be relevant."
7:55 am
April 30, 2022
Offline
dougjp said
(b) or simply, do something meaningless to justify continuing their existence/salary.
Hey, it could have been worse -- they could have made a big thing about changing their branding and logo.
Oh wait, they did that already a few years ago...
Please write your comments in the forum.