May 20, 2016
Received an email about 4.25% Investment Share offer.
What is exactly the offer? Thanks.
August 20, 2019
Invitation to Grow More
With our exclusive 4.25%* Investment Share Offering
It is my pleasure to announce to Members another way we at DUCA can help you do more, be more and achieve more.
We are pleased to offer you a high-interest, long-term investment: Our Class B Investment Shares, Series 4. With a minimum dividend of 4.25%, these new Class B Investment Shares, Series 4 may be an excellent addition to your registered portfolio and tax planning strategies.
Minimum deposit: $1,000
Maximum deposit: $2,000,000
Great long-term option: minimum 5-year term
RSP, RIF, and TFSA eligible
Easily transfer all or a portion of current term deposits into Investment Shares at no additional cost, even if the transfer occurs prior to the term’s maturity date.
Limited time, exclusive offer for Members
The capital raised through this campaign will enable DUCA to profitably and sustainably bring the DUCA difference in banking to more Ontarians. This will enable us to expand our reach as we continue to provide competitive deposit and mortgage rates, no-fee banking, and a Profit-Sharing program that rewards Members for their business. So, not only is your participation in the Investment Share Offering an opportunity to enhance your portfolio, but you’ll help grow your credit union which I believe will have a positive impact on the communities we all call home.
Invest in more by calling us at 1-866-900-3822, visiting a DUCA branch, or click on "Learn More" below.
President & CEO
* Minimum dividend rate is 4.25% annually for five years if dividends are declared. Declaration of dividends is not guaranteed. Dividends are non-cumulative. The Class B Investment Shares, Series 4 may not be redeemed until five years or more after the Issue Date. The Class B Investment Shares, Series 4 are not deposits and are not insured by the Deposit Insurance Corporation of Ontario. Class B Investment Shares, Series 4 are available only by Offering Statement. This is not an Offering Statement. Review Offering Statement for full details prior to purchase. Offer available only to DUCA Members. To become a Member and participate in this Offer, call 1.866.900.3822 or visit a DUCA branch.
May 25, 2017
May 27, 2016
This is so cheeky... 4.25% minimum guaranteed if dividends are declared and paid at all!
It's also non-cumulative, so there's no potential for catching up down the road if things go badly for a spell at DUCA and they suspend the divvie. Not to mention you'll have zero liquidity, because there's no third party market to facilitate disposal of your shares if you get fed up.
I don't think I would buy this issue even if it was supposed to be paying 6+% let alone 4.25%. Then again I'm probably not the kind of investor they're targeting anyway
October 21, 2013
As the email said, it's a long term investment. So, if you think you're going to want to cash it in , it's not for you.
Dividends from stocks are also not guaranteed, so I don't think it's a particularly cheeky offer.
The main issue for me is liquidity. Great for people who want a passive income stream.
Best for long term registered accounts as these "dividends" are not eligible for the dividend tax credit.
I don't see any evidence that they've not met their expectations in the past.
March 30, 2017
May 20, 2016
December 12, 2009
Thank you for your replies. I am not familiar with dividend payment at all. If you invest $10,000, does a minimum dividend of 4.25% mean you will get at least $425 annually? Sounds better than current GIC rates.
Yes, assuming the board of directors continues to pay the indicated dividend rate in subsequent years. The dividends aren't guaranteed, but generally speaking, it's to the board's advantage to pay the dividends because they could end up with a bunch of unhappy members who desire to redeem their investment shares and the credit union is required to hold, as percentages of their total assets and risk-weighted assets, a certain amount of equity (which can include, principally, retained profits or earnings, member shares, retained profits from business or credit union amalgamations, and member investment equity shares). "Non-cumulative" just means the board isn't obligated to pay any prior dividend payment that they opted not to pay.
Most, if not all, credit unions that do these equity raises have paid their indicated dividends and have not skipped any dividend payments. So, for me anyway (and perhaps @Loonie as well, although @Loonie doesn't generally invest in assets outside of GICs and HISAs), the inability to pay a dividend is not a significant concern.
The biggest concerns that investment shares represent include them being risk capital for regulatory purposes, meaning that they are (a) not guaranteed by any deposit insurer and (b) can be illiquid as redemption requests are subject to board of directors' approval.
Having said all of that, one of the reasons credit unions do these equity raises is, aside from the main reason using being their loan/mortgage book (their assets) having grown such that they need to raise regulatory risk capital to the required minimum level, at regular intervals (every year or two) is to accommodate redemption requests from members. Usually, the board will stipulate you hold your shares for a minimum of 5 years, after which they'll let you redeem between 10-30% of your shares per year at their par value (you get back per share what you paid).
As it is interest income, just like bank interest from a GIC, if you have available RRSP or TFSA contribution room, you can hold them in such a plan. Otherwise, it'll be taxed like GIC or HISA interest.
I can say that I'm a Sunova Credit Union Ltd member through Hubert Financial and they have paid a variable dividend, which is also non-cumulative, of between 4-7% annually in every year for the past 20-25 years or so (perhaps further, but that's far back as I've been able to obtain data).
In this way, it's actually a bit of a misnomer when we see banks doing lots of lending that they need more deposits. That's true, in the sense that the deposits are a source of funding to fund the mortgages they're onboarding; however, as far as regulatory necessity go, it's the equity they need. And, in terms of funding, credit unions and banks generally are awash in cash so they don't actually "need" deposits right now. Only time they "need" deposits is when their mortgage and loan book exceeds their deposits.
September 24, 2018
December 20, 2016
And what happens after the end of 5 years ?
At the end of five years, 10% of the total issue becomes eligible for redemption, on a first come first served basis. I don't know the exact mechanism, but I believe a form is available to be submitted to request redemption.
If a subscriber fails eligibility, their investment is rolled over for a one year term at the then current rate. On maturity, again the 10% redemption rule is in effect.
All the terms can be seen in the DUCA, 213 page, PDF offering statement HERE
Info also on DUCA's FAQ page HERE
from which this is stated:
How do I redeem Investment Shares?
Shares will be redeemable 5 years or more after the Issue Date. Redemption requests will be approved monthly by the Board of Directors on a first come, first serve basis, as no more than 10% of the total Class B Investment Shares, Series 4 outstanding at the end of the prior fiscal year may be redeemed in any fiscal year. DUCA also has the option of redeeming all or a portion of Investment Shares 5 years or more after the Issue Date.
December 26, 2018
October 21, 2013
I think it's been pretty well covered above.
The main "pro" is the possibility of a steady income stream of 4.25%. This is more than most CUs give for investment shares and compares favourably with corporate dividends.
The main "con" is lack of liquidity. You can't easily cash this investment in. And, unlike GICs, there is no absolute guarantee or insurance coverage.
In addition, Doug recently reported that DUCA was on a path to going federal. There is a thread about this somewhere, and I can't remember the details, whether they were trying to convert to a federally regulated Cu or to open a bank.
There will be significant costs involved and perhaps different liquidity requirements for them. I don't know the details, but this could be the reason these shares have been available for so long. And, accordingly, I would want to know more about that plan before I invested in the shares.
I don't think there is room in the marketplace for another Motusbank, for instance. I don't know if motus has turned a profit yet, but in my opinion it's a dud. i would be worried if DUCA went the same way with no better plan.
I belong to DUCA and find it to be a good FI that treats its members decently, but I do have unanswered questions about this planned change.
Personally, I would not buy ANY CU shares simply because I don't want an investment where there is no clear timeline on redemption. It could be fine for someone who just wants to draw the dividend and accepts the fact that it is fully taxable if non-registered.
These shares are TFSA, RSP and RIF eligible. I would ask some questions before putting it into RSP or RIF. You would need to know for sure that they are able to redeem sufficient shares to meet minimum mandatory withdrawals for RIF.
P.S. The links to the "Offering Statement" and the FAQ page don't work, so I wonder if this is really still available?
August 9, 2014
Loonie, isn't it better to just buy preferred shares from the market than to take this offer?
I wonder what is the incentive to turn federal for credit union. In quite a few provinces' regulation allow CU to accepting deposit from another province while offering higher amount of deposit insurance, and they can always open a schedule one bank that is subsidiary of themselves if they want to make lending out of province.
Not to mention isn't credit union suppose to be more local, and not suppose to seek growth. Lastly, as a CU grow even larger, I am really worry that members become even more apathetic to the operation of their CU and cause even more room for fraud by the management.
October 21, 2013
You've raised a lot of issues, Jon.
I can't really comment on preferred shares in for-profit corporations as I don't know enough about them. For me, the comparison is only to GICs or govt bonds.
I am uncertain whether DUCA plans to open a bank subsidiary or become a federal CU, so can't answer that either. The info may have been in Doug's post. I had the impression it was more likely a federal CU, but not sure.
Certainly, becoming a federal CU doesn't seem to have done much for Coast Capital - at least not that I'm aware of - and they are not really using it to go national after having had that capacity for about a year now, I think. So, I too don't understand the logic.
AltaRed would tell you that bigger is the only way to go, but, then, he doesn't deal with CUs apparently, and I am not convinced her really appreciates their ethos.
I belong to a handful of CUs, large and small, local and out of province (MB).
I have attended precisely one AGM. Spouse and I were the only people there who were not either staff or board members. This was a small CU where one might expect members to have greater involvement.
I have voted in online elections once, in the largest CU. Their AGMs are not convenient for me to attend. Come to think of it, none of them are especially convenient. I would have to drive the better part of an hour at a minimum, in order to attend any of them - and I live in Canada's largest city!
I share your concern that the mantra about "members are owners" is mostly BS and has been reduced to a marketing slogan. Most "members" seem to take very little interest in how the CU is run - unless, of course, something goes very wrong.
But, even if they did, how many of us would be able to detect anything problematic or muster the votes among complete strangers to do anything about it? In that respect, I think it isn't much different than stock shareholders except that corporate AGMs seem to take place in more convenient locations and sometimes serve better food! But those too are not places where you can get very far with any disagreements as the votes are largely controlled by proxies.
Holding shares in the stock market doesn't protect you from mismanagement. Consider Home Capital Group, for example; and I'm sure you can think of others.
Banks are regulated to some degree, and so are CUs. And their insurers have something to say about their management as well. Really, that's all we have to depend on in either case as far as I can see, to ensure they are well-run. As you know, a lot of banks went down ca. 2008.
I think that a well managed CU, even a small one, can serve its members well and be responsible. I know that one of the small CUs that I belong to has significantly stricter criteria for mortgage loans than do the big banks. Some members walk away and go to the bank when they don't get what they want, but others will listen and realize that it's risky to take on such a big mortgage and will buy a less expensive property. They only had one default last year. So, who's being irresponsible, and who is enabling the personal debt crisis? In my limited examination of the details, I've always concluded that the larger the institution, the bigger risks they take. In some ways this is understandable, as they can spread it out. However, I prefer a slow and steady boring approach that does not support undue risktaking - especially in the current economy.
I sat on the board of a large charity for 9 years, and it seems to me that basically the management runs every organization, not the Board and not the shareholders or members or stakeholders. The board I was on was active, involved, had relevant skills, and so on; but still, I felt the CEO made the decision in reality.
Relationships between managers and boards and stakeholders can be quite tricky, and I don't see that there is one best way forward to ensure good decisions. When there is conflict and things get rough, somebody resigns (whether or not they had the best ideas and plans), sometimes more than one person; and occasionally somebody gets fired. It seems, if the news is to be believed, that managers at the highest levels with the richest salaries all have exit clauses that pay them handsomely; and then they move on to another fat cat job at another large corporation in a kind of unspoken no-fault system. Many of them have defined benefit pension plans designed to their specifications, in which they are the sole members.
Do you have a better idea?
March 15, 2019
December 26, 2018
April 6, 2013
If this offer is still available, it could mean sales is progressing very slowly. Maybe others are concerned about when they will get their money back.
Their concerns are well founded. That 10% limit on redemptions is 10% of shares outstanding "at the end of the prior fiscal year" and not the shares outstanding initially. One may never get one's money back if lots of people want out.
The dividend policy amounts to paying whatever they feel like paying. Does the credit union give out loans with interest rate terms like that?
…The dividend rate shall be established by the Board, in its sole and absolute discretion, based on financial and other considerations prevailing at the time of the declarations, and, in particular, on the Credit Union’s earnings. … If the Board declares a dividend in any year, the Board will declare a dividend of not less than 4.25% for its fiscal years ending on or before December 31, 2024. For fiscal years ending after that date, the Board has defined the minimum rate to be the greater of 4.25% and the rate which exceeds by 125 Basis Points the simple average of the yields on the monthly series of the Government of Canada five-year bonds (CANSIM Identifier V122540) as published by the Bank of Canada on its website, http://www.bank-banques-canada.ca during the Credit Union’s fiscal year. This dividend policy is subject to change or exception at any time, at the Board’s discretion.
August 9, 2014
This investment share is very similar with preferred share on the market, the board of the issuer of preferred share can also decide do they want to issue dividend.
However, this investment is worst because it doesn't have a secondary market, and the interest rate can be arbitrarily determine by the board.
April 6, 2013
As well, with many market traded ones, the preferred shares start having votes after a certain number of dividends have not been declared.
These preferred shares look like junk to me because of the lack of balance in the terms. It is not ordinary for a company to be allowed to unilaterally vary the terms of the dividend, like its rate, without something to counterbalance that right, like triggering an immediate right for the holder to have their shares redeemed.
Who would buy a GIC with those kind of terms and conditions? Amount of interest paid, if any, at the issuer's discretion. Return of principal at issuer's discretion too!
October 21, 2013
August 9, 2014
Are preferred share dividends stated when you buy the shares and completely guaranteed, or do they depend on the health of the company?
The dividend from preferred share are not guaranteed, but the issuer is not allow to declare dividend to common share holder when it do not declare dividend to preferred share holder.
However, if the dividend of a preferred share is cumulative, the issuer will have to pay past promised dividend/(dividend owed ??) to preferred share holder before issuer can declear dividend to common share holder.