Your opinions please. Elderly 70 and over. Paper Bills and Paper Financial Statements | Page 3 | Your stories | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Your opinions please. Elderly 70 and over. Paper Bills and Paper Financial Statements
October 15, 2025
10:44 am
RetirEd
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1507
Member Since:
November 18, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

So what's the excuse for paying LESS for more productivity?

Why not just pay them nothing, make them all slaves and keep the cash?

Oh, right, that's how The U.S.A. became the great nation it is. And why it's still paying the price in social violence.

RetirEd

October 15, 2025
10:51 am
pwm
Headingley MB
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 118
Member Since:
October 21, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Don't waste your time replying to them AltaRed; It's not worth the effort and they will just drag you down.

October 15, 2025
11:03 am
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1324
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The US has a higher median income than Canada, with the 2023 US median around $80,610 USD and the 2022 Canadian median income approximately $50,656 USD.

The idea that higher productivity leads to lower pay = obvious nonsense.

October 15, 2025
3:54 pm
HermanH
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1408
Member Since:
April 14, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

RetirEd said

HermanH:

RetirEd said
employees working at private liquor stores here in B.C. get paid less and do more.
Is that a good thing for our society? More income inequality?

Yes, it is a good thing to improve productivity. The very definition of productivity is to do more with the same level of resources.

Those employees are being asked to do more without any benefit from the improved productivity. Their work lives are dominated by fear of losing the job.  

That is incorrect. That productivity benefit will be divided between the owners, management, and workers through bonuses, dividends, and raises. No single group will garner all the benefits, but they certainly will not gain equally.

October 16, 2025
7:19 am
COIN
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1436
Member Since:
March 15, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"There are millions of unskilled jobs that should not exist, and instead require people to have a productive skill to get a pay cheque."

These jobs are usually filled by immigrants who often don't speak English or French. However, their children often make the highest mark list in their high school graduating class.

The top high school graduate a few years ago was a young woman. When interviewed she said all the credit goes to her father who drove a cab 24/7 to support his family.

October 16, 2025
7:48 am
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1324
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Immigrants who don’t speak either English or French are a tiny minority; they exist but can’t drive taxis for obvious reasons.

Canada used to select highly educated immigrants like doctors who would often be forced into driving taxis because of unions/protectionism in Canada. Their kids would do relatively well compared to children of unselected Canadians. There are also cultural issues with kids being spoiled, drug culture, etc which hurts non-immigrant kids more.

None of it is a good reason to subsidize unnecessary and ineffective parts of the economy.

October 16, 2025
8:44 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3593
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

COIN, you are misinterpreting my comments. There are currently millions of unskilled jobs that should not exist if the rate of innovation and automation was on par with other G7 countries. There will always be a need for some relatively unskilled labour for a range of needed activities such as janitorial services, retail clerks, servers, cab drivers et al, but Canada is stuck in a time warp with the percentage of labour toiling away in unskilled jobs. There are rampant manufacturing, industrial and construction examples everywhere where automation would be a huge productivity burst.

OECD has graphs depicting the slide by Canada in GDP per capita relative to other OECD countries over the past 10-20 years but I cannot now find the graph I was looking for. However, Figure 3 from https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/were-getting-poorer-gdp-per-capita-in-canada-and-oecd-2002-2060.pdf effectively tells the same story.

We risk falling out of first world status in the next 10 years or so if we do not get our act together soon.

October 17, 2025
12:40 am
smayer97
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1055
Member Since:
September 29, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

LOTS of armchair pontification. Why not run for office if you have all the answers?

Meanwhile, what does this all have to do with the OP?

October 17, 2025
5:43 am
dougjp
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 649
Member Since:
January 9, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

cgouimet said

One of the reasons I switched to electronic billings and statements because at least once in while you want to get rid of the old ones, something I didn't want put in the garbage or recycle bin until it was shredded; tedious, time consuming and noisy. One keystroke lets you get rid of an electronic or online document, quite and effortless ...  

I finally just switched everything despite adoring paper records for decades, because of two reasons. (a) Shredding! Thanks for mentioning it, my cheap shredder overheats and takes forever to reset for use again, and (b) The post Covid greed of postal workers. The vast majority of people DON'T catch up with that resultant inflation, and also recognize reality when it's constantly in their face - insolvency of the Post office. I no longer agree to help fund their salaries because of their attitude, if I have a choice (with voting perhaps).

It's actually a relief to not bother going to the box in inclement weather!

My memory's not as sharp as it used to be. Also, my memory's not as
sharp as it used to be.

October 17, 2025
6:14 am
cgouimet
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1724
Member Since:
February 7, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Got our 1st mail (home delivery) in weeks on Wednesday. One item - our MP's quarterly update ...

CGO
October 17, 2025
2:34 pm
RetirEd
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1507
Member Since:
November 18, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

mordko said:

The idea that higher productivity leads to lower pay = obvious nonsense.

Where did you get that idea? I was saying that lowering pay to increase productivity is unjustifiable.

I didn't see anyone saying higher productivity leads to lower pay.

RetirEd

October 17, 2025
3:05 pm
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1324
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

RetirEd said
mordko said:

The idea that higher productivity leads to lower pay = obvious nonsense.

Where did you get that idea? I was saying that lowering pay to increase productivity is unjustifiable.

I didn't see anyone saying higher productivity leads to lower pay.  

Lowering pay does not increase productivity. I would expect it to lower productivity due to poor morale.

October 18, 2025
5:17 am
savemoresaveoften
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3188
Member Since:
March 30, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

dougjp said

I finally just switched everything despite adoring paper records for decades, because of two reasons. (a) Shredding! Thanks for mentioning it, my cheap shredder overheats and takes forever to reset for use again, and (b) The post Covid greed of postal workers. The vast majority of people DON'T catch up with that resultant inflation, and also recognize reality when it's constantly in their face - insolvency of the Post office. I no longer agree to help fund their salaries because of their attitude, if I have a choice (with voting perhaps).

It's actually a relief to not bother going to the box in inclement weather!  

you have the right attitude 🙂

Snail mail paper statement is just bad for the environment, carbon footprint and all.
One can still print if one choose to, from the digital copy !!

October 18, 2025
6:56 am
COIN
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1436
Member Since:
March 15, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"Snail mail paper statement is just bad for the environment, carbon footprint and all."

Do e-statements use energy and that energy has to be produced somehow?

October 18, 2025
7:22 am
CAD
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 236
Member Since:
January 25, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

COIN said
"Snail mail paper statement is just bad for the environment, carbon footprint and all."

Do e-statements use energy and that energy has to be produced somehow?  

Same questions for EV cars... Where from electricity should come so EV are 'real green cars'. Not to mention destroying earth mining all those rare elements...

October 18, 2025
7:50 am
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1324
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

COIN said
"Snail mail paper statement is just bad for the environment, carbon footprint and all."

Do e-statements use energy and that energy has to be produced somehow?  

Yes but it's a tiny fraction when compared to manufacturing paper, printing letters and envelopes and then driving cars around to deliver mail.

October 18, 2025
9:35 am
everhopeful
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 290
Member Since:
September 28, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Then there is further energy expended if the client doesn't pay online, either by mailing a cheque back across the country to the biller, or by (most likely) driving/bussing to a bank to pay at the teller window.

Even Canada Post itself seen the eventual future and created Epost at the turn of the millenium (and shuttered it in 2022 when it didn't gain traction). I think a service like that paired with a low cost internet plan (most seniors don't need gigabit home internet) with an easy to use tablet would make the transition a lot easier for a lot of folks.

In this era daily mail delivery is unsustainable, both economically and environmentaly. Any efforts to keep it is just kicking the can down the road to create an even bigger problem in the future.

October 18, 2025
9:40 am
itsme
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 31
Member Since:
February 22, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

mordko said
Yes but it's a tiny fraction when compared to manufacturing paper, printing letters and envelopes and then driving cars around to deliver mail.  

Your statement reminds me of an article I read which said producing an electric car battery makes more pollution than one gasoline powered car on the road.

Sitting behind a computer screen makes one think that it's all clean and efficient but it takes an enormous amount of energy to keep things online and running. Anyway this thread has gotten way off topic.

October 18, 2025
9:54 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3593
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Yes, it has taken on a life of its own but the original premise still applies. The sweeping change to digital delivery is irreversible and either one can get on board sooner rather than later when one has better cognitive abilities to do so, or be steam rollered into irrelevance and oblivion.

Re post #57, there are plenty of easy-to-use and inexpensive tablets available on the market for $100-150, and there are low cost internet options such as https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/connecting-families/en if one qualifies.

Also in BC via https://www.planhub.ca/home-internet there are internet plans for as little as $29/month.

There is no excuse NOT to convert to digital.

October 18, 2025
11:01 am
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1324
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

itsme said

Your statement reminds me of an article I read which said producing an electric car battery makes more pollution than one gasoline powered car on the road.

Sitting behind a computer screen makes one think that it's all clean and efficient but it takes an enormous amount of energy to keep things online and running. Anyway this thread has gotten way off topic.  

Computers don’t run because of emails. There are much, much more important reasons for them. Like porn, chatrooms and AI.

As luck would have it, someone did a calculation. An email with an attachment generates up to 50g of CO2e. Without attachment its just 4g. A letter generates 205g of CO2e. So, you are definitely destroying the planet much faster when you are using snail mail.

No permission to create posts

Please write your comments in the forum.