Topic RSS
8:57 am
January 12, 2019
Offline.
With the help of Google, these Scams are happening All to often, now . . .
.
Beware❗
- Dean
" Live Long, Healthy ... And Prosper! " 
9:45 am
October 27, 2013
Offlinemordko said
Right. Avoid sponsored links for CRA when searching. CRA isn’t going to pay to advertise itself.Google marks sponsored links as “Sponsored" or "Ad".
That cannot be emphasized enough! Do not click on any of those links with "Sponsored", "Ad", etc. That applies to all media.
There has been a serious one showing on Facebook recently and on the CBC News App supposedly using Mark Carney et al to sell $350 investments in CanFirst (or similar names) to get extraordinary returns. The Saskatchewan regulator has had to issue a release to the provincial public not to fall for this scheme.
It is pretty clear corporations are NOT screening ads that are purchased and displayed on their platforms.
10:33 am
April 27, 2017
OfflineLegitimate small local businesses use Google and Facebook ads to promote their services to targeted audiences. It could be a local farm, a theatre, etc. it's their way to compete with the likes of Amazon and mega corps.
Absolutely nothing is wrong with clicking on ads. But like with everything we do, one has to make use of that thing between the ears.
11:33 am
November 5, 2022
OfflineThe criminal frauds and scams are certainly accelerating. One assumes that offshore criminals are using bots and AI to automatically fake thousands of websites. The vulnerable will get robbed.
https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/general-comparisons/ubs-canada-gics-hisa/
11:36 am
October 27, 2013
Offline@Mordko, fair enough. My underlined statement was too cryptic and too much of a blanket statement.
I generally only click on 'sponsored ads' from entities and domains I am familiar with, e.g known media, government, and retail goods/services businesses I already know.
If I do see a 'sponsored ad' from an unfamiliar source and it appears to be of personal interest, I will do a separate Google search for the entity from scratch. I will not click on any links from within ads from unknown/unfamiliar sources.
The point being is none of us need to be 'sold' anything. If we are interested in buying something, we can (and should) independently google search for ourselves.
1:16 pm
January 12, 2019
Offlinemordko said
. . .
Absolutely nothing is wrong with clicking on ads. But like with everything we do, one has to make use of that thing between the ears.
True ⬆️ ... to a point.
Some people just simply lack the knowledge/awareness of what can happen when you use Google to find a website for you.
In the case linked in Post #1, she Googled; 'CRA' and was given a number of choices. Unfortunatley, she picked the wrong/bad one. 
Stuff like this is happening every day now.
- Dean
" Live Long, Healthy ... And Prosper! " 
8:15 pm
October 17, 2018
OfflineIt really couldn't be easier to remember than this https://www.canada.ca/ . I bookmark sites like this as it improves security .
10:00 am
April 6, 2013
OfflineIt is a good idea to bookmark one's banking sites if one doesn't wish to remember them.
Very risky to access one's online banking through a Google search each time. I warned one friend who was doing that.
Scammers don't need to buy an ad to have their fake site show up for awhile at the top of search results. There are "search engine optimization" firms that specialize in getting one's site to the top of search emgine results for certain search terms.
Some clients of one financial institution got scammed that way. I think it was a Canadian credit union. The financial institution refused compensation as their online banking site and systems weren't compromised.
Victims did a search and clicked on a link at the top of the search results to access their online banking. Unfortunately, that time the top result was to a fake look-a-like site.
11:12 am
October 27, 2013
OfflineThat has happened with at least a few, if not several, FIs. At least 3-4 of the FIs I do business with feature prominent messages on their login pages regarding these phishing/scam activities.
I do agree that Google searches are not fool proof. Google, Meta et al all claim they remove billions of fake/scam/dishonest ads per year off their sites, employing thousands of people. Whether they are doing all they can or not is an open question but users of the Internet need to be far more savvy themselves.
4:03 pm
November 18, 2017
OfflineI don't use Google or Facebook for anything, and block all their domains. (Along with all the social media.) DuckDuckGo is, at the moment, a safer alternative that doesn't get all the Google scams. Of course, one still has to be alert about everything else out there, but it's not as big a target for advertizers.
And I like the feeling that I'm not feeding the Google monster.
RetirEd
5:24 pm
January 12, 2019
Offline.
Further to that ⬆️ . . .
.
Quack 
- Dean
" Live Long, Healthy ... And Prosper! " 
5:47 pm
April 27, 2017
OfflineDuckduckgo does not track your IP so good if thats your concern. You get less personalization as a result though. I have no reason to hide my IP as I don’t do anything illegal and I like personalization.
Google employs more robust security defences against phishing, malware, and unsafe content. You really need to use a strong antivirus program with DDG. Although it is apparently improving.
Google is better for search accuracy by far and its a lot faster, so there is that. DDG relies on Bing which does not work for me.
9:12 pm
February 22, 2024
OfflineYou really need to use a strong antivirus program with DDG. Although it is apparently improving.
Google is better for search accuracy by far and its a lot faster, so there is that. DDG relies on Bing which does not work for me.
Huh? So where was google's "more robust security defences" when it let the lady access a scam site, and through their ads no less?
I ditched google years ago for search and use Duckduckgo. It gives relevant results, and that you need better antivirus software using it than for google is rubbish.
10:06 pm
April 27, 2017
OfflineIt's just a fact. Facts should not upset you. Google has built in threat detection and filtering mechanisms and DDG does not. I am talking about prevention of getting “infections” from the web. Google search tries to warn you about phishing and malware and Chrome provides protection.
As for scam websites, nothing is completely immune. DDG also gives scams as top results. Obviously less of a news-making issue than Google algorithm missing a bad website.
If it gives you what you want then great.
7:20 am
October 27, 2013
OfflineThe major platforms profess to employ thousands of employees who take down billions of ads and fake websites that violate platform policy every year but they likely cannot catch all of them even if they did a better job of it. I agree no search engine is immune. Pure fantasy.
Even news media like CBC get caught with scam ads on their apps due to lack of effort and/or expertise of their systems to scrub the bad actors.
7:51 am
March 30, 2017
Offline8:45 am
November 18, 2017
Offlinemordko: I hate "personalization" - I want to see all the same offerings as everyone else. That's why I don't stream content or read magazines on line. Any filtering or personalization will be done, I know, to benefit the filter-makers, not me.
I rarely use search, preferring to use my own known links and those from secure (non-web) sources.
RetirEd
9:28 am
April 27, 2017
OfflineI like personalization. If I like hockey and ballet but not football and opera then reading ads related to opera and football is wasteful for me and for the advertiser. For ads to work they have to benefit you as well as the ad-maker. No point spending money on ads related to children’s activities on people without kids.
Thanks to AI you can “personalize” the internet yourself. For example every morning you could be getting technical news related to metallurgy or nuclear physics or environmental regulations if that’s your area of interest. And they could be prioritized by relevance, importance, category of sources, etc. And you can make adjustments if it's not quite right. People used to do this in some companies but AI seems to do a better job. You can do the same for financial news or whatever rocks your boat.
Log In
Register
Home
Facebook
Twitter
Email this
Please write your comments in the forum.