Yet another example of why Google is NOT your friend :-( | Your stories | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Yet another example of why Google is NOT your friend :-(
June 24, 2025
8:57 am
Dean
Valhalla Mountains, British Columbia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2578
Member Since:
January 12, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

.
With the help of Google, these Scams are happening All to often, now . . .

.
Beware❗

    Dean

sf-cool " Live Long, Healthy ... And Prosper! " sf-cool

June 24, 2025
9:13 am
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1324
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Right. Avoid sponsored links for CRA when searching. CRA isn’t going to pay to advertise itself.

Google marks sponsored links as “Sponsored" or "Ad".

June 24, 2025
9:45 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3593
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

mordko said
Right. Avoid sponsored links for CRA when searching. CRA isn’t going to pay to advertise itself.

Google marks sponsored links as “Sponsored" or "Ad".  

That cannot be emphasized enough! Do not click on any of those links with "Sponsored", "Ad", etc. That applies to all media.

There has been a serious one showing on Facebook recently and on the CBC News App supposedly using Mark Carney et al to sell $350 investments in CanFirst (or similar names) to get extraordinary returns. The Saskatchewan regulator has had to issue a release to the provincial public not to fall for this scheme.

It is pretty clear corporations are NOT screening ads that are purchased and displayed on their platforms.

June 24, 2025
10:33 am
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1324
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Legitimate small local businesses use Google and Facebook ads to promote their services to targeted audiences. It could be a local farm, a theatre, etc. it's their way to compete with the likes of Amazon and mega corps.

Absolutely nothing is wrong with clicking on ads. But like with everything we do, one has to make use of that thing between the ears.

June 24, 2025
11:33 am
InterestThis
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 447
Member Since:
November 5, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The criminal frauds and scams are certainly accelerating. One assumes that offshore criminals are using bots and AI to automatically fake thousands of websites. The vulnerable will get robbed.

https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/general-comparisons/ubs-canada-gics-hisa/

June 24, 2025
11:36 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3593
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

@Mordko, fair enough. My underlined statement was too cryptic and too much of a blanket statement.

I generally only click on 'sponsored ads' from entities and domains I am familiar with, e.g known media, government, and retail goods/services businesses I already know.

If I do see a 'sponsored ad' from an unfamiliar source and it appears to be of personal interest, I will do a separate Google search for the entity from scratch. I will not click on any links from within ads from unknown/unfamiliar sources.

The point being is none of us need to be 'sold' anything. If we are interested in buying something, we can (and should) independently google search for ourselves.

June 24, 2025
1:16 pm
Dean
Valhalla Mountains, British Columbia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2578
Member Since:
January 12, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

mordko said

. . .

Absolutely nothing is wrong with clicking on ads. But like with everything we do, one has to make use of that thing between the ears.  

True ⬆️ ... to a point.

Some people just simply lack the knowledge/awareness of what can happen when you use Google to find a website for you.

In the case linked in Post #1, she Googled; 'CRA' and was given a number of choices. Unfortunatley, she picked the wrong/bad one. sf-confused

Stuff like this is happening every day now.

    Dean

sf-cool " Live Long, Healthy ... And Prosper! " sf-cool

June 24, 2025
5:26 pm
COIN
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1436
Member Since:
March 15, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I once got an email purporting to be from PayPal offering me $5. I called the real PayPal and they confirmed that the $5 offer is from the real PayPal. (I forgot now why the real PayPal offered me $5.)

June 24, 2025
8:15 pm
Oscar
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 326
Member Since:
October 17, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It really couldn't be easier to remember than this https://www.canada.ca/ . I bookmark sites like this as it improves security .

June 25, 2025
10:00 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7896
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It is a good idea to bookmark one's banking sites if one doesn't wish to remember them.

Very risky to access one's online banking through a Google search each time. I warned one friend who was doing that.

Scammers don't need to buy an ad to have their fake site show up for awhile at the top of search results. There are "search engine optimization" firms that specialize in getting one's site to the top of search emgine results for certain search terms.

Some clients of one financial institution got scammed that way. I think it was a Canadian credit union. The financial institution refused compensation as their online banking site and systems weren't compromised.

Victims did a search and clicked on a link at the top of the search results to access their online banking. Unfortunately, that time the top result was to a fake look-a-like site.

June 25, 2025
11:12 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3593
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

That has happened with at least a few, if not several, FIs. At least 3-4 of the FIs I do business with feature prominent messages on their login pages regarding these phishing/scam activities.

I do agree that Google searches are not fool proof. Google, Meta et al all claim they remove billions of fake/scam/dishonest ads per year off their sites, employing thousands of people. Whether they are doing all they can or not is an open question but users of the Internet need to be far more savvy themselves.

June 25, 2025
4:03 pm
RetirEd
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1507
Member Since:
November 18, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I don't use Google or Facebook for anything, and block all their domains. (Along with all the social media.) DuckDuckGo is, at the moment, a safer alternative that doesn't get all the Google scams. Of course, one still has to be alert about everything else out there, but it's not as big a target for advertizers.

And I like the feeling that I'm not feeding the Google monster.

RetirEd

June 25, 2025
5:24 pm
Dean
Valhalla Mountains, British Columbia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2578
Member Since:
January 12, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

.
Further to that ⬆️ . . .

.
Quack sf-wink

    Dean

sf-cool " Live Long, Healthy ... And Prosper! " sf-cool

June 25, 2025
5:47 pm
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1324
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Duckduckgo does not track your IP so good if thats your concern. You get less personalization as a result though. I have no reason to hide my IP as I don’t do anything illegal and I like personalization.

Google employs more robust security defences against phishing, malware, and unsafe content. You really need to use a strong antivirus program with DDG. Although it is apparently improving.

Google is better for search accuracy by far and its a lot faster, so there is that. DDG relies on Bing which does not work for me.

June 25, 2025
9:12 pm
itsme
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 31
Member Since:
February 22, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

You really need to use a strong antivirus program with DDG. Although it is apparently improving.

Google is better for search accuracy by far and its a lot faster, so there is that. DDG relies on Bing which does not work for me.  

Huh? So where was google's "more robust security defences" when it let the lady access a scam site, and through their ads no less?

I ditched google years ago for search and use Duckduckgo. It gives relevant results, and that you need better antivirus software using it than for google is rubbish.

June 25, 2025
10:06 pm
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1324
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It's just a fact. Facts should not upset you. Google has built in threat detection and filtering mechanisms and DDG does not. I am talking about prevention of getting “infections” from the web. Google search tries to warn you about phishing and malware and Chrome provides protection.

As for scam websites, nothing is completely immune. DDG also gives scams as top results. Obviously less of a news-making issue than Google algorithm missing a bad website.

Duck Duck Go phishing attempt
byu/SquatCobbbler inSchwab

If it gives you what you want then great.

June 26, 2025
7:20 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3593
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The major platforms profess to employ thousands of employees who take down billions of ads and fake websites that violate platform policy every year but they likely cannot catch all of them even if they did a better job of it. I agree no search engine is immune. Pure fantasy.

Even news media like CBC get caught with scam ads on their apps due to lack of effort and/or expertise of their systems to scrub the bad actors.

June 26, 2025
7:51 am
savemoresaveoften
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3188
Member Since:
March 30, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I compare it to its impossible to have zero physical crime, no matter how many police u add to the force. The internet is no different.

June 26, 2025
8:45 am
RetirEd
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1507
Member Since:
November 18, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

mordko: I hate "personalization" - I want to see all the same offerings as everyone else. That's why I don't stream content or read magazines on line. Any filtering or personalization will be done, I know, to benefit the filter-makers, not me.

I rarely use search, preferring to use my own known links and those from secure (non-web) sources.

RetirEd

June 26, 2025
9:28 am
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1324
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I like personalization. If I like hockey and ballet but not football and opera then reading ads related to opera and football is wasteful for me and for the advertiser. For ads to work they have to benefit you as well as the ad-maker. No point spending money on ads related to children’s activities on people without kids.

Thanks to AI you can “personalize” the internet yourself. For example every morning you could be getting technical news related to metallurgy or nuclear physics or environmental regulations if that’s your area of interest. And they could be prioritized by relevance, importance, category of sources, etc. And you can make adjustments if it's not quite right. People used to do this in some companies but AI seems to do a better job. You can do the same for financial news or whatever rocks your boat.

No permission to create posts

Please write your comments in the forum.