Topic RSS
10:07 am
September 29, 2017
Offline10:15 am
September 11, 2013
OfflinePrivate sector, business leaders, their job is profits, not the welfare of the nation (except to the extent they see it's in their profit-motive interest). If I'm an owner of shares I expect the business to do whatever it legally can to maximize my stake's value even if that means selling everything to the nearest, biggest market. That's the private sector's job.
And that's one reason we have governments. To, IF NEEDED, offset the private sector's self-directed goals with government policy that benefits the collective. Governments over the decades should have made sure, especially because of our unique geographical situation in the world, that our economy has a lot of customers, suppliers, etc, via laws, regulations, rules, tax policy, trade agreements, quotas, whatever tools it has, to make sure our eggs weren't all in one basket. Just in case.
I mean, just to give one example, we have a country with immense resources and we've got more than half the population buying some of that from foreign sources due to a lack of pipelines - what real country does that, for decades on end?
10:27 am
January 12, 2019
OfflineBill said
Incorrect reading of what I was implying, Dean.
If we, like almost everybody else, are pretty much irrelevant to behemoth USA it never made sense to base our entire economy on being so reliant on them, easy and apparently obvious as it was to do that. Long time ago policy makers should have realized that was a big risk, to essentially be an economic vassal to the world power, and should have made sure we developed significant trade with other countries around the world as well.
Nothing wrong with trading with USA where it's to our advantage, where it makes sense to cherry pick the obvious and good stuff, as RetireEd indicated, but it's always wrong to be as completely dependent as we are on any one country IF we claim to be more than a branch of that country, claim to be an independent state.

.
- Dean
" Live Long, Healthy ... And Prosper! " 
3:57 pm
September 29, 2017
Offline5:21 pm
January 12, 2019
Offline3:01 am
September 29, 2017
Offline11:30 am
September 29, 2017
Offline8:45 am
January 12, 2019
Offline.
I tend to agree ⬆️ ... But July 30th will tell for sure . . .
As The Stomach Turns,
- Dean
" Live Long, Healthy ... And Prosper! " 
10:36 am
September 29, 2017
Offline12:13 am
September 29, 2017
Offline8:35 am
November 19, 2022
Offline9:51 am
January 12, 2019
OfflineUkrainianDude said
Rates are already ultra low. Why would anyone have any expectations of them to go even lower?
Say What⁉️
The BoC's present rate (@ 2.75%) is 'Faaar' from ultra low❗
If you check the BoC 25yr rate history, you'll find that their rates have been as Low as 0.50% ... ⬅️ That would be considered 'Ultra Low'.
- Dean
" Live Long, Healthy ... And Prosper! " 
7:49 pm
November 19, 2022
OfflineDean said
Say What⁉️
The BoC's present rate (@ 2.75%) is 'Faaar' from ultra low❗
If you check the BoC 25yr rate history, you'll find that their rates have been as Low as 0.50% ... ⬅️ That would be considered 'Ultra Low'.
Dean
BOC rate was as high as 16% so yeah 2.75% is ultra low. Anything below 4-5% is ultra low. Everything above 10% is high.
6:44 am
January 11, 2020
OfflineWhat’s the long-term 25-50year average? Are we currently above or below that long-term average?
For myself, I find the cost to borrow money and go into debt is still particularly cheap, which is the number one reason we’re headed for a huge shaking of the tree.. money that was too cheap distorted asset prices and the cost of taking big risks. I think money’s priced too low myself.
7:53 am
February 7, 2019
OfflineMattS said
What’s the long-term 25-50year average? Are we currently above or below that long-term average?
For myself, I find the cost to borrow money and go into debt is still particularly cheap, which is the number one reason we’re headed for a huge shaking of the tree.. money that was too cheap distorted asset prices and the cost of taking big risks. I think money’s priced too low myself.
BoC Averages ...
1990-2025 ... 3.2%
2000-2025 ... 2.1%
2010-2025 ... 1.6%
2020-2025 ... 2.6%
| CGO |
7:59 am
November 19, 2022
Offline8:06 am
November 19, 2022
OfflineMattS said
What’s the long-term 25-50year average? Are we currently above or below that long-term average?
For myself, I find the cost to borrow money and go into debt is still particularly cheap, which is the number one reason we’re headed for a huge shaking of the tree.. money that was too cheap distorted asset prices and the cost of taking big risks. I think money’s priced too low myself.
We can see that the rates are ultra low because the assets prices like RE are hyper inflated.
8:18 am
February 7, 2019
Offline8:53 am
November 19, 2022
Offlinecgouimet said
I haven't collected it but if you decide to find it yourself, feel free to share ...
Not quite but comparable.
The highest mortgage rate in Canadian history was 21.75% in August 1981 for a 5-year fixed mortgage.
The 1970s Mortgage Rate Range: 10.25% - 13.25%
The 1980s Mortgage Rate Range: 10.00% - 21.75%
The 1990s Mortgage Rate Range: 6.60% - 13.25%
After that the ultra low rates came and prices became hyper inflated.
7:18 am
March 15, 2019
Offline"The 1970s Mortgage Rate Range: 10.25% - 13.25%
The 1980s Mortgage Rate Range: 10.00% - 21.75%
The 1990s Mortgage Rate Range: 6.60% - 13.25%"
I remember the 1980's. We were suffering hyper inflation. Reagan and Volcker raised interest rates to kill the Carter inflation. Those high rates created a horrible recession/depression. Tough medicine but it worked.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Volcker
"Volcker was widely credited with having ended the high levels of inflation seen in the United States throughout the 1970s and early 1980s"
Log In
Register
Home
Facebook
Twitter
Email this
Please write your comments in the forum.