<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	    <channel>
        <title>Canadian High Interest Savings Bank Accounts - Forum: Outlook Financial</title>
        <link>https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Read all about Tangerine Bank, Hubert Financial, EQ Bank, Motive Financial, Alterna Bank, and more]]></description>
        <generator>Simple:Press Version 6.11.10</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		                <item>
                    <title>Warwick111 on Outlook Financial Merger and Conversion dates</title>
                    <link>https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-merger-and-conversion-dates/#p110973</link>
                    <category>Outlook Financial</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-merger-and-conversion-dates/#p110973</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I just received an email from Outlook Financial on the system conversion dates.</p>
<p><em>Merger Update: Merger commitments in action and bringing our systems together<br />
As we continue moving through the merger process, we remain focused on providing clear updates to help you feel supported throughout this transition. We are very excited about the next phase of the merger and have some important news to share about changes that will affect you.</em></p>
<p>Bringing our banking systems together<br />
We are pleased to announce the dates for our banking system and digital banking conversions. This will take place over the course of two weekends. The legacy Caisse conversion will occur during the weekend of March 21-22, 2026, followed by the legacy Westoba conversion scheduled for October 10 –11, 2026. </p>
<p>More system changes after Hubert -&#062; Access CU and Motive -&#062; NBC.</p>
<p>P.S.    It did not mention an Outlook Financial conversion so may be the only conversions are Caisse and Westoba converting to the Assiniboine CU system.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 05:28:53 -0800</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>RetirEd on Outlook Financial fees</title>
                    <link>https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99972</link>
                    <category>Outlook Financial</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99972</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>True, but RRSPs can't be withdrawn and then reinserted.  Once in, once out and once taxed.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:55:05 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>cgouimet on Outlook Financial fees</title>
                    <link>https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99957</link>
                    <category>Outlook Financial</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99957</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>RetirEd said </strong><br />
<strong>cgouimet</strong>: For CRA to administer the millions of TFSA accounts, they have to field and track all the financial institutions' movements of cash into and out of registered status, not to mention things like recontributions and "in kind" complications.  And track down all the inevitable errors and complaints.  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>They also do that for RSP's without the same complication of withdrawals that can't be "reversed" until the following year.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:38:49 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>RetirEd on Outlook Financial fees</title>
                    <link>https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99955</link>
                    <category>Outlook Financial</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99955</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>cgouimet</strong>: For CRA to administer the millions of TFSA accounts, they have to field and track all the financial institutions' movements of cash into and out of registered status, not to mention things like recontributions and "in kind" complications.  And track down all the inevitable errors and complaints.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:06:13 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>AltaRed on Outlook Financial fees</title>
                    <link>https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99933</link>
                    <category>Outlook Financial</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99933</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Software recording the transactions, maintenance of same, account holder and CRA reporting all have a cost associated with them, never mind additional CSRs to handle physical interactions with account holders with their complaints and questions (see post #3 as an example).  It took awhile for FIs to make TFSAs available for obvious reasons just like FHSAs now are slow to be made available. There is not enough money in it. </p>
<p>There is a reason some discount brokerages in particular have account administration fees for account sizes less than certain threshold values, e.g. $15k or $25k. </p>
<p>The point remains that no one should really complain about reasonable A&#038;G fees, and especially transfer out fees for leaving the entity.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2024 02:15:55 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>cgouimet on Outlook Financial fees</title>
                    <link>https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99932</link>
                    <category>Outlook Financial</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99932</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>AltaRed said </strong><br />
I suspect most FIs would have wished TFSAs had never been foisted on them by Ottawa. RRSPs were doing quite nicely by themselves. </p>
<p>The costs of administering TFSAs with their withdrawal and re-contribution mechanisms is not in shareholder/member best interests. FIs are not charities, i.e. they have to cover their A&#038;G.  Nor did Ottawa ever say these accounts should be administered at no cost.  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I sure would like to know what the rationale was for the contribution/withdrawal complications...</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2024 01:35:26 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>AltaRed on Outlook Financial fees</title>
                    <link>https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99930</link>
                    <category>Outlook Financial</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99930</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I suspect most FIs would have wished TFSAs had never been foisted on them by Ottawa. RRSPs were doing quite nicely by themselves. </p>
<p>The costs of administering TFSAs with their withdrawal and re-contribution mechanisms is not in shareholder/member best interests. FIs are not charities, i.e. they have to cover their A&#038;G.  Nor did Ottawa ever say these accounts should be administered at no cost.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2024 01:19:47 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>Wrayzor on Outlook Financial fees</title>
                    <link>https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99928</link>
                    <category>Outlook Financial</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99928</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>AltaRed said </strong><br />
The other options are: 11) not to transfer out in the first place, and/or 2) get the receiving institution to cover the transfer cost (many do just that) as a cost of doing business to attract accounts.  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>A third option is withdraw and recontribute elsewhere (the following year, if maxed out in the current year).  Yes, some shielded income may end up being taxed, but if that's a concern then Option 2 would be the way to go.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2024 00:35:58 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>cgouimet on Outlook Financial fees</title>
                    <link>https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99926</link>
                    <category>Outlook Financial</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99926</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I believe free TFSA transfers are the exception. </p>
<p>But, in my experience, FI's receiving TFSA transfers will compensate you for the sending FI's transfer charges.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2024 23:26:53 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>AltaRed on Outlook Financial fees</title>
                    <link>https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99925</link>
                    <category>Outlook Financial</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99925</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I don't understand the hostility to transfer out fees. It would seem only fair that FIs should be charging 'reasonable' transfer out fees, especially for registered accounts, to cover the administrative costs of people leaving an entity. It seems unreasonable to expect shareholders/members of banks/CUs to shoulder the costs of those leaving the FI. $50 would barely cover an 'all in' hour's worth of A&#038;G.</p>
<p>The other options are: 11) not to transfer out in the first place, and/or 2) get the receiving institution to cover the transfer cost (many do just that) as a cost of doing business to attract accounts.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2024 23:26:08 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>RetirEd on Outlook Financial fees</title>
                    <link>https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99922</link>
                    <category>Outlook Financial</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99922</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it's anti-competitive.  That's why almost all financial institutions (Outlook and Peoples being among the exceptions) do it.  Why do dogs lick themselves? And why those transfer-out fees will continue to rise.</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2024 21:19:56 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>KRB666 on Outlook Financial fees</title>
                    <link>https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99916</link>
                    <category>Outlook Financial</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-financial-fees/#p99916</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>BEWARE - Outlook Financial (OF) charges a $50 transfer-out fee on TFSAs</p>
<p>It should be noted, Outlook Financial makes a $50 charge to transfer your hard-earned TFSAs to another Canadian financial institution.</p>
<p>This should be abolished &#038; made illegal in Canada, like in the UK. Other financial institutions such as EQ &#038; Oaken, for example, do not make such a charge, so why does OF ?</p>
<p>This so-called $50 'admin.' charge is counter to the whole ethos why the Canadian Government established the TFSA system in the first place; namely, for individuals to SAVE their own, hard-earned money in a tax-free ‘wrapper’, with the capital growing year-on-year until needed, NOT for disreputable Canadian financial institutions to feather their own nests’ at the expense of diligent savers. TFSA transfers between Canadian financial institutions should be FREE, in a free-market banking economy. </p>
<p>This $50 fee seriously impedes savers’ ability to shop around to get the best interest rates on the market when their TFSA GIC term deposit matures, for example. The current scenario locks individuals into a specific financial institution &#038; prevents a free-market banking system in Canada. Furthermore, it actually becomes uneconomic &#038; impossible for savers to transfer funds between institutions if they only have a nominal amount in their TFSA (&#060;$50). There is little hope of ever accumulating sufficient interest to pay this fee. Moreover, after 2 years, do these same TFSAs then become subject to ‘dormancy’ charge ? </p>
<p>This $50 fee seems totally counter to OF's Mission Statement &#038; Core Values, namely,</p>
<p>Mission:<br />
Act, &#034;as a socially responsible co-operative, providing financial services for the betterment of members, employees &#038; communities.&#034;</p>
<p>Values:<br />
Act with, &#034;Integrity - consistently honest, fair, respectful &#038; compassionate in all our relations &#038; do the right thing for the right reason.<br />
Accountability - take responsibility for the financial, social, environmental &#038; economic impacts of our decisions &#038; actions, &#038; disclose our performance in a transparent manner&#034;</p>
<p>Other financial institutions don't charge this fee because any such nominal transfer costs are easily offset by the profit margin created by the spread between the customer borrowing &#038; savings interest rates. This is typically how banks the world over generate their profits, not from hidden standing charges. </p>
<p>OF needs to abolish this $50 transfer-out fee.</p>
<p>I have written to the following &#038; would strongly urge you to also lobby &#038; complain in order to get positive change &#038; a fit-for-purpose TFSA system at OF.</p>
<p>Federal<br />
The Honourable Chrystia Freeland - Deputy PM &#038; Minister of Finance,<br />
Your MP<br />
The Honourable Jonathan Wilkinson - (North Vancouver), Minister of Energy &#038; Natural Resources (my MP),<br />
The Financial Ombudsman of Canada </p>
<p>Provincial<br />
The Honourable Adrien Sala, MLA - Minister of Finance, Manitoba<br />
The Financial Ombudsman of Banking, Finance &#038; Credit Unions, Manitoba </p>
<p>Assiniboine Credit Union (ACU) / Outlook Financial (OF)<br />
Mr. Kevin Sitka, President &#038; CEO<br />
All Board members &#038; Executive</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2024 09:15:47 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>hwyc on Outlook increases rates</title>
                    <link>https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-increases-rates/#p88409</link>
                    <category>Outlook Financial</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-increases-rates/#p88409</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>3.60% effective July 18,2023    ... was 3.50%</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 22:14:41 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>hwyc on Savings Accounts Rates Down</title>
                    <link>https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/savings-accounts-rates-down/#p87867</link>
                    <category>Outlook Financial</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/savings-accounts-rates-down/#p87867</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>Effective Jun28, HISA down to 3.50% (was 3.55%)</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 22:22:10 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				                <item>
                    <title>hwyc on Outlook increases rates</title>
                    <link>https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-increases-rates/#p86954</link>
                    <category>Outlook Financial</category>
                    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.highinterestsavings.ca/forum/outlook-financial/outlook-increases-rates/#p86954</guid>
					                        <description><![CDATA[<p>I see Savings dropped to 3.40% (was 3.45%), effective May 29, 2023</p>
]]></description>
					                    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 04:30:15 -0700</pubDate>
                </item>
				    </channel>
	</rss>
